Evaluating the Practices in the E-Learning Platform from the Perspective of Knowledge Management

A growing number of higher education institutions have adopted asynchronous and synchronous Web-based learning platforms to improve students’ learning efficiency and increase learning satisfaction. To understand how students use e-learning platforms and what the implications are, we conducted an empirical study of the iCAN e-learning platform, which has been widely used in Fu-Jen Catholic University. We use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), a multi-criteria evaluation approach, to compare five practices of the teaching platform. We designed a questionnaire to measure learners’ perception of the e-learning platform based on the theory of knowledge transforming process in knowledge management. Accordingly, the model considers functioning and objectivity in terms of the following three dimensions of learning effectiveness:individual learning, group sharing and learning performance. Twelve criteria with twelve evaluation items were used to investigate the effectiveness of the five practices. We also evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of the functions based on the types of courses in the iCan platform. We expect that the empirical evaluation results will provide teachers with suggestions and guidelines for using the e-learning platform effectively to facilitate their teaching activities and promote students’ learning efficiency and satisfaction.

[1]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[2]  D. Dubois,et al.  Operations on fuzzy numbers , 1978 .

[3]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[4]  Andrina Granic,et al.  Usability Testing and Expert Inspections Complemented by Educational Evaluation: A Case Study of an e-Learning Platform , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Andrina Granic,et al.  e-Learning process management and the e-learning performance: Results of a European empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[6]  Samuel K. Riffell,et al.  Learning Online: Student Perceptions of a Hybrid Learning Format. , 2003 .

[7]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Cyber Schooling framework: improving mobility and situated learning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[8]  Yuji Sato QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN FOR SURVEY RESEARCH: EMPLOYING WEIGHTING METHOD , 2005 .

[9]  Elliot Soloway,et al.  Examining 25 years of technology in U.S. education , 2002, Commun. ACM.

[10]  Yolande E. Chan,et al.  Integrating Knowledge Management Practices Through a Problem Solving Framework , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[12]  Duen-Ren Liu,et al.  Task-based K-Support system: disseminating and sharing task-relevant knowledge , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[13]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[14]  E. Lee,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy numbers based on the probability measure of fuzzy events , 1988 .

[15]  Maria Beckman Collaborative Learning: Preparation for the Workplace and Democracy?. , 1990 .

[16]  Alfonso Quarati,et al.  ICT Driven Individual Learning: New Opportunities and Perspectives , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..