Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice

Drawing upon recent research, this article reviews the theory underlying the use of socioscientific issues (SSI) in science education. We begin with a definition and rationale for SSI and note the importance of SSI for advancing functional scientific literacy. We then examine the various roles of context, teachers, and students in SSI lessons as well as the importance of classroom discourse, including sociomoral discourse, argumentation, discussion, and debate. Finally, we discuss how SSI units, which encourage evidence-based decisionmaking and compromise, can improve critical thinking, contribute to character education, and provide an interesting context for teaching required science content.

[1]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Advancing reflective judgment through Socioscientific Issues , 2009 .

[2]  Chantal Pouliot.  Students' inventory of social actors concerned by the controversy surrounding cellular telephones: A case study , 2008 .

[3]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas , 2002 .

[4]  Stein Dankert Kolstø,et al.  Patterns in Students’ Argumentation Confronted with a Risk‐focused Socio‐scientific Issue , 2006 .

[5]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  Promoting Discourse about Socioscientific Issues through Scaffolded Inquiry , 2007 .

[6]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  Science education for everyday life: Evidence‐based practice , 2006 .

[7]  John H. Grych,et al.  Early Character Development and Education , 2000 .

[8]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues. , 2005 .

[9]  Marvin W. Berkowitz.  The Development of Sociomoral Discourse. , 1986 .

[10]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students , 2009 .

[11]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .

[12]  M. Ratcliffe,et al.  Science Education for Citizenship , 2003 .

[13]  T. Sadler.  Moral and Ethical Dimensions of Socioscientific Decision-Making as Integral Components of Scientific Literacy. , 2004 .

[14]  Ralph Levinson,et al.  Towards a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Controversial Socio‐scientific Issues , 2006 .

[15]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[16]  P. Facione.  Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts , 2011 .

[17]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education , 2005 .

[18]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Character, and Care , 2007 .

[19]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education , 2003 .

[20]  D. Zeidler,et al.  Social and Ethical Issues in Science Education: A Prelude to Action , 2008 .

[21]  D. Narvaez,et al.  What Works in Character Education: What Is Known and What Needs to Be Known , 2008 .

[22]  Dana L. Zeidler,et al.  The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education , 2003 .

[23]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[24]  M. Berkowitz,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF CHARACTER EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS , 2003 .