A stochastic model updating method for parameter variability quantification based on response surface models and Monte Carlo simulation

Abstract Stochastic model updating must be considered for quantifying uncertainties inherently existing in real-world engineering structures. By this means the statistical properties, instead of deterministic values, of structural parameters can be sought indicating the parameter variability. However, the implementation of stochastic model updating is much more complicated than that of deterministic methods particularly in the aspects of theoretical complexity and low computational efficiency. This study attempts to propose a simple and cost-efficient method by decomposing a stochastic updating process into a series of deterministic ones with the aid of response surface models and Monte Carlo simulation. The response surface models are used as surrogates for original FE models in the interest of programming simplification, fast response computation and easy inverse optimization. Monte Carlo simulation is adopted for generating samples from the assumed or measured probability distributions of responses. Each sample corresponds to an individual deterministic inverse process predicting the deterministic values of parameters. Then the parameter means and variances can be statistically estimated based on all the parameter predictions by running all the samples. Meanwhile, the analysis of variance approach is employed for the evaluation of parameter variability significance. The proposed method has been demonstrated firstly on a numerical beam and then a set of nominally identical steel plates tested in the laboratory. It is found that compared with the existing stochastic model updating methods, the proposed method presents similar accuracy while its primary merits consist in its simple implementation and cost efficiency in response computation and inverse optimization.

[1]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[2]  Ricardo Perera,et al.  A response surface methodology based damage identification technique , 2009 .

[3]  M. Friswell,et al.  Perturbation methods for the estimation of parameter variability in stochastic model updating , 2008 .

[4]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage assessment by FE model updating using damage functions , 2002 .

[5]  Ken Badcock,et al.  Propagation of structural uncertainty to linear aeroelastic stability , 2010 .

[6]  B. Michael Adams Design and Analysis of Experiments, Sixth Edition , 2005 .

[7]  Shlomo S. Sawilowsky,et al.  You Think You’ve Got Trivials? , 2003 .

[8]  Jm M. Ko,et al.  An improved perturbation method for stochastic finite element model updating , 2008 .

[9]  Ilya M. Sobol,et al.  A Primer for the Monte Carlo Method , 1994 .

[10]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[11]  A. L. Cundy,et al.  Use of Response Surface Metamodels in Damage Identification of Dynamic Structures , 2003 .

[12]  Michael Link,et al.  Stochastic model updating—Covariance matrix adjustment from uncertain experimental modal data , 2010 .

[13]  J. Beck,et al.  Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework , 1998 .

[14]  Wei Zeng,et al.  Algorithms and Applications , 2013 .

[15]  Sondipon Adhikari,et al.  Random matrix eigenvalue problems in structural dynamics , 2007 .

[16]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[17]  Ricardo Perera,et al.  Damage identification by response surface based model updating using D-optimal design , 2011 .

[18]  Shlomo S. Sawilowsky,et al.  Invited Debate: Target Article You Think You've Got Trivials? , 2003 .

[19]  Andrea Saltelli,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Importance Assessment , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[20]  Jon D. Collins,et al.  Statistical Identification of Structures , 1973 .

[21]  Guido De Roeck,et al.  Damage identification of a reinforced concrete frame by finite element model updating using damage parameterization , 2008 .

[22]  J.E. Mottershead,et al.  Stochastic model updating: Part 2—application to a set of physical structures , 2006 .

[23]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Stochastic Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 2005 .

[24]  Ronald L. Wasserstein,et al.  Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications , 1997 .

[25]  J. M. Lucas,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 3rd edition , 2010 .

[26]  David Moens,et al.  A Non-Probabilistic Finite Element Approach for Structural Dynamic Analysis with Uncertain Parameters, PhD thesis , 2002 .

[27]  Mauro J. Atalla,et al.  Model updating using neural networks , 1996 .

[28]  Huajiang Ouyang,et al.  PARAMETER SELECTIONS FOR STOCHASTIC UNCERTAINTY IN DYNAMIC MODELS OF SIMPLE AND COMPLICATED STRUCTURES , 2010 .

[29]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The adjustment of structural parameters using a minimum variance estimator , 1989 .

[30]  P. Guillaume,et al.  Finite element model updating taking into account the uncertainty on the modal parameters estimates , 2006 .

[31]  Michael Link,et al.  Damage identification by multi-model updating in the modal and in the time domain , 2009 .

[32]  C. Maresa,et al.  Stochastic model updating : Part 1 — theory and simulated example , 2006 .