The Effect of Progress Indicator Speeds on Users' Time Perceptions and Experience of a Smartphone User Interface

The primary goal of this study focused on manipulating the speed of the progress indicator to decrease users’ time perception and improve satisfaction with and personal preference for a smartphone user interface. The experiment of this study adopted a 3 × 2 mixed factorial design using ANOVA to examine the three progress indicator speeds, i.e., normal, slow to fast and fast to slow, and two wait durations, 5 s and 15 s, using different progress indicators. The results show that speed has no significant effect on time perception. However, a more complex feedback type may increase participants’ time perception, especially for a long wait duration (i.e., 15 s). The speed of “fast to slow” can make participants more satisfied than the speed “slow to fast,” just in the case of the bar indicator. Participants were more satisfied with 5 s than 15 s. Finally, there was a positive impact on the participants’ preferences when they perceived a shorter wait duration.

[1]  Karl Vierordt,et al.  Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen , 1868 .

[2]  Zhiquan Yeo,et al.  Faster progress bars: manipulating perceived duration with visual augmentations , 2010, CHI.

[3]  Robert Bell,et al.  Rethinking the progress bar , 2007, UIST.

[4]  P. Fraisse Perception and estimation of time. , 1984, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  R. Ornstein,et al.  The experience of time , 1986 .

[6]  T. S. Amer,et al.  Information Technology Progress Indicators: Temporal Expectancy, User Preference, and the Perception of Process Duration , 2016, Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact..

[7]  Woojoo Kim,et al.  Effect of Loading Symbol of Online Video on Perception of Waiting Time , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[8]  Carine Lallemand,et al.  Enhancing User eXperience during waiting time in HCI: contributions of cognitive psychology , 2012, DIS '12.

[9]  Mario Callegaro,et al.  Where Am I? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on the Effects of Progress Indicators for Web Surveys , 2013 .

[10]  Christopher A. Sanchez,et al.  The interaction of map resolution and spatial abilities on map learning , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[11]  John A. Hoxmeier,et al.  System Response Time and User Satisfaction: An Experimental Study of Browser-based Applications , 2000 .

[12]  J. Hornik Subjective vs. Objective Time Measures: A Note on the Perception of Time in Consumer Behavior , 1984 .

[13]  P. Trahanias,et al.  Passage of time judgments in everyday life are not related to duration judgments except for long durations of several minutes. , 2017, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  The impact of progress indicators on task completion , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[15]  Scott W. Brown Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.