Variations among Adults in Their Use of Morphemic Spelling Rules and Word-Specific Knowledge when Spelling.

The purpose of this research was to examine whether adults rely on morphemic spelling rules or word-specific knowledge when spelling simple words. We examined adults’ knowledge of two of the simplest and most reliable rules in English spelling concerning the morphological word ending –s. This spelling is required for regular plural nouns (e.g., bricks, bees) and third-person singular present tense verbs (e.g., kicks, sees), but not for similar sounding one-morpheme words (e.g., mix, breeze). In study 1, 205 young adults’ understanding of these rules was tested. These were adults who were recruited for training in skilled and semiskilled jobs. They were asked in four different choice tasks to choose the appropriate spelling of pseudowords whose endings were determined by their morphological sentence contexts (e.g., Jim wants only one grix). Only 7.4% of individual participants’ choices were significantly above chance in at least three of the four pseudoword categories tested. In study 2, 72 undergraduate students completed the same tasks, and 83% achieved above chance performance on at least three categories. Taken together, these results suggest that many adults depend on word-specific knowledge, rather than spelling rules, when spelling even very simple words. They also throw some doubt on the generality of conclusions about people’s use of morphology in literacy tasks that have been drawn from previous research, which has depended very heavily on testing samples consisting entirely of undergraduate participants.

[1]  Jay G Rueckl,et al.  Are CORNER and BROTHER morphologically complex? Not in the long term , 2008, Language and cognitive processes.

[2]  J. Richard Gentry,et al.  An Analysis of Developmental Spelling in GYNS AT WRK. , 1982 .

[3]  Nenagh Kemp,et al.  Do beez buzz? Rule-based and frequency-based knowledge in learning to spell plural -s. , 2003, Child development.

[4]  Kevin Diependaele,et al.  Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[5]  P. Bryant,et al.  Causal connections in the acquisition of an orthographic rule: a test of Uta Frith's developmental hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[6]  R. Olson,et al.  Gender ratios for reading difficulties. , 2009, Dyslexia.

[7]  J. S. Burt,et al.  Spelling in Adults: The Combined Influences of Language Skills and Reading Experience , 2006, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[8]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Psychology of Sex , 1933, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[9]  L. Ehri Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. , 1997 .

[10]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Treiman and Cassar SPELLING ACQUISITION IN ENGLISH , 1997 .

[12]  C. Varnhagen,et al.  Is children ’ s spelling naturally stage-like ? , 1997 .

[13]  C. Leong The Role of Inflectional Morphology in Canadian Children's Word Reading and Spelling , 2009, The Elementary School Journal.

[14]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  How Complex Simplex Words can be , 1997 .

[15]  A Pickles,et al.  Persistence of literacy problems: spelling in adolescence and at mid-life. , 2009, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[16]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[17]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Sources of difficulty in learning to spell and read , 1987 .

[18]  L. Pring,et al.  The Processing of Inflectional Morphology: A Comparison of Children with and without Dyslexia , 2004 .

[19]  P. Bryant,et al.  Learning To Spell Regular and Irregular Verbs. , 1997 .