A feasibility study of two adaptive-control methods for vector-controlled induction motor drives

The authors evaluate two adaptive control methods for vector-controlled AC drives under parameter variations, namely a minimum variance controller (MVC) and a model reference exact-matching (MREM) method. They compare them to a nonadaptive model reference complementary controller (MRCC) and address their potential impact on designing PWM (pulse width modulation) inverters. Digital simulation results indicate that although all the methods considered had similar responses for nominal conditions, the MVC and MREM exhibited a higher performance than the MRCC under variations of the rotor time constant. However, the MVC PWM signal placed a more severe burden on the PWM stage. It is concluded that a comprehensive solution for the problem of parameter variations should include a combination of an identification method for the rotor parameters and adaptive control method to meet the desired specifications (rise time, bandwidth, speed range, etc.).<<ETX>>

[1]  R. G. Harley,et al.  An Aid for Teaching Field Oriented Control Applied to Induction Machines , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[2]  P. Pillay,et al.  Speed controller design for a vector-controlled permanent magnet synchronous motor drive with parameter variations , 1990, Conference Record of the 1990 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[3]  Ying-Yu Tzou,et al.  Multimicroprocessor-based robust control of an AC induction servo motor , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[4]  R. Krishnan,et al.  Study of Parameter Sensitivity in High-Performance Inverter-Fed Induction Motor Drive Systems , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  A. Kumamoto,et al.  Speed regulation of an induction motor using model reference adaptive control , 1986, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[6]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Theory and applications of self-tuning regulators , 1977, Autom..