The COOLER Code: A Novel Analytical Approach to Calculate Subcellular Energy Deposition by Internal Electron Emitters

COmputation Of Local Electron Release (COOLER), a software program has been designed for dosimetry assessment at the cellular/subcellular scale, with a given distribution of administered low-energy electron-emitting radionuclides in cellular compartments, which remains a critical step in risk/benefit analysis for advancements in internal radiotherapy. The software is intended to overcome the main limitations of the medical internal radiation dose (MIRD) formalism for calculations of cellular S-values (i.e., dose to a target region in the cell per decay in a given source region), namely, the use of the continuous slowing down approximation (CSDA) and the assumption of a spherical cell geometry. To this aim, we developed an analytical approach, entrusted to a MATLAB-based program, using as input simulated data for electron spatial energy deposition directly derived from full Monte Carlo track structure calculations with PARTRAC. Results from PARTRAC calculations on electron range, stopping power and residual energy versus traveled distance curves are presented and, when useful for implementation in COOLER, analytical fit functions are given. Example configurations for cells in different culture conditions (V79 cells in suspension or adherent culture) with realistic geometrical parameters are implemented for use in the tool. Finally, cellular S-value predictions by the newly developed code are presented for different cellular geometries and activity distributions (uniform activity in the nucleus, in the entire cell or on the cell surface), validated against full Monte Carlo calculations with PARTRAC, and compared to MIRD standards, as well as results based on different track structure calculations (Geant4-DNA). The largest discrepancies between COOLER and MIRD predictions were generally found for electrons between 25 and 30 keV, where the magnitude of disagreement in S-values can vary from 50 to 100%, depending on the activity distribution. In calculations for activity distribution on the cell surface, MIRD predictions appeared to fail the most. The proposed method is suitable for Auger-cascade electrons, but can be extended to any energy of interest and to beta spectra; as an example, the 3H case is also discussed. COOLER is intended to be accessible to everyone (preclinical and clinical researchers included), and may provide important information for the selection of radionuclides, the interpretation of radiobiological or preclinical results, and the general establishment of doses in any scenario, e.g., with cultured cells in the laboratory or with therapeutic or diagnostic applications. The software will be made available for download from the DTU-Nutech website: http://www.nutech.dtu.dk/.

[1]  S. Incerti,et al.  Calculation of cellular S-values using Geant4-DNA: The effect of cell geometry. , 2015, Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine.

[2]  A. Dhawan,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet No. 25: MIRDcell V2.0 Software Tool for Dosimetric Analysis of Biologic Response of Multicellular Populations , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  A. M. G. Vicente,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet No. 25: MIRDcell V2.0 Software Tool for Dosimetric Analysis of Biologic Response of Multicellular Populations , 2014 .

[4]  C. Cutaia,et al.  Modeling Dose Deposition and DNA Damage Due to Low-Energy β– Emitters , 2014, Radiation research.

[5]  L. Yasui Molecular and cellular effects of Auger emitters: 2008–2011 , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[6]  A. Campa,et al.  Track structure, radiation quality and initial radiobiological events: Considerations based on the PARTRAC code experience , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  Peter Jacob,et al.  Track structures, DNA targets and radiation effects in the biophysical Monte Carlo simulation code PARTRAC. , 2011, Mutation research.

[8]  A. Kassis Molecular and cellular radiobiological effects of Auger emitting radionuclides. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  P. Hadjidoukas,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of cellular S-factors for 1 keV to 1 MeV electrons , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  N Lanconelli,et al.  Differences among Monte Carlo codes in the calculations of voxel S values for radionuclide targeted therapy and analysis of their impact on absorbed dose evaluations. , 2009, Medical physics.

[11]  Stephen R. Thomas,et al.  MIRD Pamphlet No. 21: A Generalized Schema for Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry—Standardization of Nomenclature , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Amin I Kassis,et al.  Therapeutic radionuclides: biophysical and radiobiologic principles. , 2008, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[13]  R. H. Ritchie,et al.  Comparisons of Calculations with PARTRAC and NOREC: Transport of Electrons in Liquid Water , 2008, Radiation research.

[14]  A. Pathak,et al.  Subcellular S-factors for low-energy electrons: A comparison of Monte Carlo simulations and continuous-slowing-down calculations , 2008, International journal of radiation biology.

[15]  D. Emfietzoglou,et al.  The Auger effect in physical and biological research , 2008, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  H. Schicha,et al.  Diethylstilbestrol (DES) labeled with Auger emitters: Potential radiopharmaceutical for therapy of estrogen receptor-positive tumors and their metastases? , 2008, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  Kostas Kostarelos,et al.  Single-cell dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma patients with special reference to leukemic spread. , 2007, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[18]  Anirban Pathak,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of energy deposition at the sub-cellular level for application to targeted radionuclide therapy with low-energy electron emitters , 2007 .

[19]  Francis A. Cucinotta,et al.  Track-structure codes in radiation research , 2006 .

[20]  Roger W Howell,et al.  Log normal distribution of cellular uptake of radioactivity: implications for biologic responses to radiopharmaceuticals. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  S. Strand,et al.  Internal microdosimetry for single cells in radioimmunotherapy of B-cell lymphoma. , 2005, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[22]  B. Fallone,et al.  Monte Carlo investigation of single cell beta dosimetry for intraperitoneal radionuclide therapy. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  D. Weiss,et al.  Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and intracellular distribution of the Auger electron emitter 65Zn in two human cell lines , 2004, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[24]  A. Kassis The Amazing World of Auger Electrons , 2004, International journal of radiation biology.

[25]  A. Kassis Cancer therapy with Auger electrons: are we almost there? , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  B Aubert,et al.  Validation of the EGS usercode DOSE3D for internal beta dose calculation at the cellular and tissue levels. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  J. Jay-Gerin,et al.  Low-Energy Electron Penetration Range in Liquid Water , 2002, Radiation research.

[28]  Wei Bo Li,et al.  Track Structures and Dose Distributions from Decays of 131I and 125I in and around Water Spheres Simulating Micrometastases of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer , 2001, Radiation research.

[29]  H. Lundqvist,et al.  Radiation doses to the cell nucleus in single cells and cells in micrometastases in targeted therapy with (131)I labeled ligands or antibodies. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  G. Griffiths,et al.  Cytotoxicity with Auger electron‐emitting radionuclides delivered by antibodies , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[31]  S. Doglia,et al.  Technical report: Cell thickness measurements by confocal fluorescence microscopy on C3H10T1/2 and V79 cells. , 1998, International journal of radiation biology.

[32]  R. Howell The MIRD Schema: from organ to cellular dimensions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  A. Kassis The MIRD approach: remembering the limitations. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  F. H. Attix Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry , 1991 .

[35]  D. Goodhead,et al.  Thickness measurements on V79-4 cells: a comparison between laser scanning confocal microscopy and electron microscopy. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[36]  D. W. Vinter,et al.  Inhomogeneous deposition of radiopharmaceuticals at the cellular level: experimental evidence and dosimetric implications. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  D. W. Vinter,et al.  Microscopic Spatial Inhomogeneity of Radiopharmaceutical Deposition in Mammalian Tissues: Dosimetry at the Cellular Level and Comparison with Conventional Dosimetry , 1990 .

[38]  D. Rogers Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry by F. H. Attix , 1987 .

[39]  R. W. Fink,et al.  X-Ray Fluorescence Yields, Auger, and Coster-Kronig Transition Probabilities , 1972 .

[40]  A. Cole Absorption of 20-eV to 50,000-eV electron beams in air and plastic. , 1969, Radiation research.

[41]  M. J. Berger,et al.  Density effect for the ionization loss of charged particles in various substances , 1966 .

[42]  R. Sternheimer,et al.  Density Effect for the Ionization Loss in Various Materials , 1952 .

[43]  H. Bethe Bremsformel für Elektronen relativistischer Geschwindigkeit , 1932 .

[44]  K Eckerman,et al.  ICRP Publication 107. Nuclear decay data for dosimetric calculations. , 2008, Annals of the ICRP.

[45]  D. J. Strom,et al.  Microdosimetric properties of ionizing electrons in water: a test of the PENELOPE code system. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  Herwig G. Paretzke,et al.  Electron inelastic-scattering cross sections in liquid water , 1999 .

[47]  A Ottolenghi,et al.  A Monte Carlo calculation of cell inactivation by light ions. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[48]  K. Townsend,et al.  Nuclear area measurement on viable cells, using confocal microscopy. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[49]  M. J. Berger ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer programs for calculating stopping-power and range tables for electrons, protons, and helium ions , 1992 .

[50]  R. Howell,et al.  Macroscopic dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: nonuniform activity distributions in solid tumors. , 1989, Medical physics.

[51]  H. Eisenlohr Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry: by F.H. Attix. Published by Wiley-Interscience (1986). ISBN 0-471-01146-0. 607 pp. £52.75 , 1987 .

[52]  M. J. Berger,et al.  Tables of energy losses and ranges of electrons and positrons , 1964 .

[53]  R. Sternheimer,et al.  The density effect for ionization loss in materials , 1952 .

[54]  H. Bethe Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie , 1930 .