The invisible college of cluster research: a bibliometric core–periphery analysis of the literature

ABSTRACT This paper explores the evolutionary trajectories of cluster research, building upon the sociology of science concept of the invisible college, and it undertakes a core–periphery analysis of the literature. We build a database that includes 8,381 articles, collected from Web of Science, that cite the foundational works of cluster research, and we perform a longitudinal analysis of its evolution from 1985 onward, identifying the core and periphery, in terms of keywords and concepts, for each period (six-year window). We find evidence that cluster research has a core–periphery structure. Literature develops thanks to new inputs from the periphery, which increases over time as the core progressively shrinks. The periphery becomes fragmented and is characterised by subgroups of small communities. Drawing on the metaphor of the invisible college, we argue that this evolutionary trajectory is not exclusive of the cluster but might possibly characterise other scientific concepts.

[1]  Ron Martin,et al.  Rethinking the “Economic” in Economic Geography: Broadening Our Vision or Losing Our Focus? , 2001 .

[2]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  THE USE OF CITATION DATA IN WRITING THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE , 1964 .

[3]  Henry Small,et al.  Cited Documents as Concept Symbols , 1978 .

[4]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[5]  P. Cooke.  Regional innovation systems: Competitive regulation in the new Europe , 1992 .

[6]  Andrea Bergmann,et al.  Citation Indexing Its Theory And Application In Science Technology And Humanities , 2016 .

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[8]  D. Crane.  Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the "Invisible College" Hypothesis , 1969 .

[9]  Robert Hassink,et al.  Regional resilience: a stretched concept?* , 2018, Dislocation: Awkward Spatial Transitions.

[10]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Michael Schwartz,et al.  Interlocking Directorates and Interest Group Formation , 1981 .

[12]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[13]  Alesia Zuccalá,et al.  Modeling the invisible college , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  L. Lievrouw.  The Invisible College Reconsidered , 1989 .

[15]  Frank Witlox,et al.  Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research , 2016 .

[16]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[17]  Björn Asheim,et al.  Industrial districts as ‘learning regions’. A condition for prosperity? , 1996 .

[18]  V. Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Subject Index , 2011 .

[19]  B. Martin.  The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies , 2012 .

[20]  M. Danson.  Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[21]  Gino Cattani,et al.  A Core/Periphery Perspective on Individual Creative Performance: Social Networks and Cinematic Achievements in the Hollywood Film Industry , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[22]  R. Martin,et al.  On the notion of regional economic resilience: conceptualization and explanation , 2015 .

[23]  O. Persson,et al.  How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis , 2009 .

[24]  T. D. Stokes,et al.  Coauthorship, Social Structure and Influence Within Specialties , 1989 .

[25]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[26]  S. Cruz,et al.  The Evolution of the Cluster Literature: Shedding Light on the Regional Studies–Regional Science Debate , 2010 .

[27]  Shahid A. Zia,et al.  Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries & Competitors , 2013 .

[28]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks , 1974 .

[29]  A. Ramos-Rodríguez,et al.  Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980–2000 , 2004 .

[30]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties , 1974 .

[31]  R. Martin,et al.  Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea? , 2003 .

[32]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: origin of the species , 2008 .

[33]  C. Kadushin,et al.  The Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: on social circles in urban life. , 1966, American sociological review.

[34]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[35]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[36]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[37]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  Dimensions of Citation Analysis , 1990 .

[38]  Noah P. Barsky.  A Core/Periphery Structure in a Corporate Budgeting Process , 2007 .

[39]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[40]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation studies—The emerging structure of a new scientific field , 2009 .

[41]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Models of core/periphery structures , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[42]  Claudia Werker,et al.  Keith Pavitt and the Invisible College of the Economics of Technology and Innovation , 2004 .

[43]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  Exploring the emerging knowledge base of ‘the knowledge society’ , 2012 .

[44]  J. Raab,et al.  Powell (1990): Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization , 2018, Schlüsselwerke der Netzwerkforschung.

[45]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Straining but not thriving : Understanding network dynamics in underperforming industrial clusters , 2019 .

[46]  G. Calabretta,et al.  The Intellectual Structure of Product Innovation Research: A Bibliometric Study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004 , 2010 .

[47]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  What do citations count? the rhetoric-first model , 1989, Scientometrics.

[48]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  Science Since Babylon , 1961 .

[49]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[50]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences1 , 2005, American Journal of Sociology.

[52]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[53]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[54]  Mario A. Maggioni,et al.  Mapping the Evolution of 'Clusters': A Meta-Analysis , 2009 .

[55]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A bibliometric analysis , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[56]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation data as science indicators , 1978 .

[57]  Christian A. Cancino,et al.  A bibliometric analysis of leading universities in innovation research , 2017 .

[58]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Power, Influence and Social Circles: A New Methodology for Studying Opinion Makers , 1968 .

[59]  Silvia Rita Sedita,et al.  Founders and disseminators of cluster research , 2014 .

[60]  José M. Merigó,et al.  Academic research in innovation: a country analysis , 2016, Scientometrics.

[61]  O. Williamson.  Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations , 1973 .

[62]  G. Sartori.  Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics , 1970, American Political Science Review.

[63]  Nicolai Juul Foss,et al.  Research In Strategy, Economics, and Michael Porter* , 1996 .

[64]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[65]  C. Herstatt,et al.  The rise and fall of interdisciplinary research: The case of open source innovation , 2013 .

[66]  Jose-Luis Hervas-Oliver,et al.  Clusters and Industrial Districts: Where is the Literature Going? Identifying Emerging Sub-Fields of Research , 2015 .

[67]  H. Small.  A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .

[68]  Wiliam Wiggenhorn,et al.  Motorola U: when training becomes an education , 1990 .

[69]  D. Chubin.  State of the Field The Conceptualization of Scientific Specialties , 1976 .

[70]  David Collier,et al.  Conceptual “Stretching” Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis , 1993, American Political Science Review.

[71]  R. Bartle.  A brief history of the mathematical literature , 1995 .

[72]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  Metatheorizing citation , 2006, Scientometrics.

[73]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: an author co‐citation analysis , 2008 .

[74]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .