Three-Dimensional Vessel Reconstruction from Microscopic Image Sequence

Image registration is vital to medical image analysis. It is frequently used in 2D mosaicing to construct the whole image of a biological specimen and in 3D reconstruction to build up the structure of a specimen from a series of microscopic images. Nevertheless, many factors, including microscopic optics, mechanical factors, sensors, and manipulation may contribute to great differences even between adjacent image slices. Cuts, tears, folds, and deformation can cause chromatic aberration as well as geometric discrepancies. These flaws can make the alignment of all image slices very difficult. In this paper, we adopt a featurebased registration method, called robust point matching (RPM), to reconstruct 3D vessels automatically from rat brains using a series of microscopic images. The registration algorithm simultaneously evaluates spatial correspondence and geometric transformation between two point sets corresponding to the extracted feature points from two adjacent slices. Using this robust statistical mechanism, the deterministic annealing method automatically retains matched feature point pairs and removes unmatched ones as outliers. Experimental studies have shown promising results on 3D vessel reconstruction of rat brains and demonstrate accurate registration from microscopic image sequences.

[1]  Martin Capek,et al.  Alignment of adjacent picture frames captured by a CLSM , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[2]  D. Berdichevsky,et al.  Improved Methods for Image Registration , 1996, NeuroImage.

[3]  Charles R. Meyer,et al.  Mutual Information for Automated Unwarping of Rat Brain Autoradiographs , 1997, NeuroImage.

[4]  James S. Duncan,et al.  A robust point-matching algorithm for autoradiograph alignment , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  R. J. Althof,et al.  A rapid and automatic image registration algorithm with subpixel accuracy , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Jane You,et al.  A wavelet-based coarse-to-fine image matching scheme in a parallel virtual machine environment , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[8]  Fabrice Heitz,et al.  Registration of MR/MR and MR/SPECT Brain Images by Fast Stochastic Optimization of Robust Voxel Similarity Measures , 1998, NeuroImage.

[9]  Richard Sinkhorn A Relationship Between Arbitrary Positive Matrices and Doubly Stochastic Matrices , 1964 .

[10]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Federico Girosi,et al.  Parallel and Deterministic Algorithms from MRFs: Surface Reconstruction , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Daniel Cohen-Or,et al.  Mosaicing Ultrasonic Volumes for Visual Simulation , 2000, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[13]  R. Somorjai,et al.  An improved robust hierarchical registration algorithm. , 1997, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

[14]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Video mosaics for virtual environments , 1996, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[15]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Voxel Similarity Measures for 3D Serial MR Brain Image Registration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Interpolation Artefacts in Mutual Information-Based Image Registration , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..