Nanowastes and the environment: Using mercury as an example pollutant to assess the environmental fate of chemicals adsorbed onto manufactured nanomaterials

Emerging nanotechnologies hold great promise for creating new means of detecting pollutants, cleaning polluted waste streams, and recovering materials before they become wastes, thereby protecting environmental quality. Studies focusing on the different advantages of nanoscience and nanotechnology abound in the literature, but less research effort seems to be directed toward studying the fate and potential impacts of wastes that will be generated by this technology. Using a combination of biogeochemical and toxicological methods, we conducted a preliminary investigation of the potential environmental fate of Hg as an example pollutant bound to nanomaterials used in treatment of gas effluents. Methylation of Hg sorbed onto SiO(2)-TiO(2) nanocomposites was used as a proxy for Hg bioavailability to sedimentary microorganisms, and the FluoroMetPLATE assay was used to assess the toxicity of both virgin and Hg-loaded SiO(2)-TiO(2) nanocomposites. Our results show that the bioavailability of Hg sorbed onto SiO(2)-TiO(2) nanocomposites to sedimentary microorganisms is pH dependent, with decreasing reaction rates as the pH increases from 4 to 6. Toxicity tests conducted using liquid extracts obtained by leaching of Hg-loaded SiO(2)-TiO(2) nanocomposites with the synthetic precipitation leaching procedure solution showed an average inhibition of 84% (vs 57% for virgin SiO(2)-TiO(2) nanocomposites). These results suggest that Hg sorbed onto engineered nanoparticles could become bioavailable and toxic if introduced into natural systems. Accordingly, studies focusing on the environmental implications of nanomaterials should include determination of the fate and impacts of pollutants that enter the environment bound to engineered nanomaterials.

[1]  Eva Oberdörster,et al.  Ecotoxicology of carbon-based engineered nanoparticles: Effects of fullerene (C60) on aquatic organisms , 2006 .

[2]  G. Bitton,et al.  Evaluation of a microplate assay specific for heavy metal toxicity , 1994, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[3]  Vincent M Rotello,et al.  Toxicity of gold nanoparticles functionalized with cationic and anionic side chains. , 2004, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[4]  K. Powers,et al.  Adsorption enhancement mechanisms of silica-titania nanocomposites for elemental mercury vapor removal. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  J. West,et al.  The Differential Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Fullerenes , 2004 .

[6]  Robert H. Hurt,et al.  Toxicology of carbon nanomaterials: Status, trends, and perspectives on the special issue , 2006 .

[7]  E. Oberdörster Manufactured Nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) Induce Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Juvenile Largemouth Bass , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[8]  J. Bonzongo,et al.  Impact of Land Use and Physicochemical Settings on Aqueous Methylmercury Levels in the Mobile-Alabama River System , 2004, Ambio.

[9]  Xiao-Hong Nancy Xu,et al.  Real-time probing of membrane transport in living microbial cells using single nanoparticle optics and living cell imaging. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[10]  C. Daughton Non-regulated water contaminants: emerging research , 2004 .

[11]  E. Crecelius,et al.  Determination of mercury in seawater at sub-nanogram per liter levels , 1983 .

[12]  N. Bloom Determination of Picogram Levels of Methylmercury by Aqueous Phase Ethylation, Followed by Cryogenic Gas Chromatography with Cold Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Detection , 1989 .

[13]  E. Roden,et al.  Microbial mercury transformation in anoxic freshwater sediments under iron-reducing and other electron-accepting conditions. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.