Assessing the hydrologic performance of the EPA’s nonpoint source water quality assessment decision support tool using North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) products

The accuracy of streamflow predictions in the EPA's BASINS (Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources) decision support tool is affected by the sparse meteorological data contained in BASINS. The North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) data with high spatial and temporal resolutions provide an alternative to the NOAA National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)'s station data. This study assessed the improvement of streamflow prediction of the Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN (HSPF) model contained within BASINS using the NLDAS 1/8 degree hourly precipitation and evapotranspiration estimates in seven watersheds of the Chesapeake Bay region. Our results demonstrated consistent improvements of daily streamflow predictions in five of the seven watersheds when NLDAS precipitation and evapotranspiration data was incorporated into BASINS. The improvement of using NLDAS data is significant when the watershed's meteorological station is either far away or not in a similar climatic region. When the station is nearby, using NLDAS data produces similar results. The correlation coefficients of the analyses using NLDAS data were greater than 0.8, the Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) model fit efficiency greater than 0.6, and the error in the water balance was less than 5%. Our analyses also showed that the streamflow improvements were mainly contributed by NLDAS precipitation data and that the improvement from using NLDAS evapotranspiration data was not significant; partially due to the constraints of current BASINS-HSPF settings. However, NLDAS evapotranspiration data did improve the baseflow prediction. This study demonstrates NLDAS data has the potential to improve stream flow predictions, thus aid the water quality assessment in the EPA nonpoint water quality assessment decision tool.

[1]  D. Deaven,et al.  Changes to the Operational ''Early'' Eta Analysis / Forecast System at the National Centers for Environmental Prediction , 1996 .

[2]  V. Singh,et al.  Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology , 1995 .

[3]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Application of two hydrologic models with different runoff mechanisms to a hillslope dominated watershed in the northeastern US: a comparison of HSPF and SMR , 2003 .

[4]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  Land information system: An interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[5]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Real‐time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project , 2003 .

[6]  M. Clark,et al.  Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations , 2001 .

[7]  D. Legates,et al.  Evaluating the use of “goodness‐of‐fit” Measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation , 1999 .

[8]  John Doherty,et al.  Methodologies for calibration and predictive analysis of a watershed model, by John Doherty and John M. Johnston. Author's reply , 2003 .

[9]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Evaluation of the North American Land Data Assimilation System over the southern Great Plains during the warm season , 2003 .

[10]  R. Wilby,et al.  Statistical downscaling of hydrometeorological variables using general circulation model output , 1998 .

[11]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[12]  N. Crawford,et al.  DIGITAL SIMULATION IN HYDROLOGY' STANFORD WATERSHED MODEL 4 , 1966 .

[13]  E. Albek,et al.  Hydrological modeling of Seydi Suyu watershed (Turkey) with HSPF , 2004 .

[14]  Enoch M. Dlamini,et al.  Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling , 1997 .

[15]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[16]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[17]  Jeffrey P. Walker,et al.  THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[18]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Accuracy Evaluation of Rainfall Disaggregation Methods , 2004 .

[19]  H. R. Haise,et al.  Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation , 1963 .

[20]  J. L. Kittle,et al.  Hydrological simulation program: Fortran. User's manual for release 10 , 1993 .

[21]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .

[22]  D. Ruppert,et al.  Transformation and Weighting in Regression , 1988 .

[23]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[24]  J. Arnold,et al.  HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF THE IROQUOIS RIVER WATERSHED USING HSPF AND SWAT 1 , 2005 .

[25]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[26]  J. Boccio,et al.  Computer program manual , 1972 .

[27]  U. S. Tim,et al.  AN INTERACTWE MODELING ENVIRONMENT FOR NON‐POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL 1 , 1997 .

[28]  Sujay V. Kumar,et al.  High-performance Earth system modeling with NASA/GSFC’s Land Information System , 2007, Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering.

[29]  D. Entekhabi,et al.  Disaggregation of Daily Rainfall for Continuous Watershed Modeling , 2001 .

[30]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  Hydrological Simulation Program - Fortran (HSPF). , 1995 .