Implicit large-eddy simulation applied to turbulent channel flow with periodic constrictions

The subgrid-scale (SGS) model in a large-eddy simulation (LES) operates on a range of scales which is marginally resolved by discretization schemes. Accordingly, the discretization scheme and the subgrid-scale model are linked. One can exploit this link by developing discretization methods from subgrid-scale models, or the converse. Approaches where SGS models and numerical discretizations are fully merged are called implicit LES (ILES). Recently, we have proposed a systematic framework for the design, analysis, and optimization of nonlinear discretization schemes for implicit LES. In this framework parameters inherent to the discretization scheme are determined in such a way that the numerical truncation error acts as a physically motivated SGS model. The resulting so-called adaptive local deconvolution method (ALDM) for implicit LES allows for reliable predictions of isotropic forced and decaying turbulence and of unbounded transitional flows for a wide range of Reynolds numbers. In the present paper, ALDM is evaluated for the separated flow through a channel with streamwise-periodic constrictions at two Reynolds numbers Re  =  2,808 and Re  =  10,595. We demonstrate that, although model parameters of ALDM have been determined for isotropic turbulence at infinite Reynolds number, it successfully predicts mean flow and turbulence statistics in the considered physically complex, anisotropic, and inhomogeneous flow regime. It is shown that the implicit model performs at least as well as an established explicit model.

[1]  U. Schumann Subgrid Scale Model for Finite Difference Simulations of Turbulent Flows in Plane Channels and Annuli , 1975 .

[2]  Jochen Fröhlich,et al.  Evaluation of Detached Eddy Simulations for predicting the flow over periodic hills , 2007 .

[3]  P. Woodward,et al.  Inertial range structures in decaying compressible turbulent flows , 1998 .

[4]  A. Leonard Energy Cascade in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Fluid Flows , 1975 .

[5]  Michael Manhart,et al.  DNS OF A TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYER WITH SEPARATION , 2002, Proceeding of Second Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena.

[6]  J. Domaradzki,et al.  Effective eddy viscosities in implicit modeling of decaying high Reynolds number turbulence with and without rotation , 2005 .

[7]  P. Smolarkiewicz,et al.  Effective eddy viscosities in implicit large eddy simulations of turbulent flows , 2003 .

[8]  J. P. Boris,et al.  New insights into large eddy simulation , 1992 .

[9]  K. Kuwahara,et al.  Computation of high Reynolds number flow around a circular cylinder with surface roughness , 1984 .

[10]  Christer Fureby,et al.  From canonical to complex flows: Recent progress on monotonically integrated LES , 2004, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[11]  Ugo Piomelli,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulations: Theory and Applications , 1996 .

[12]  L. Margolin,et al.  A rationale for implicit turbulence modelling , 2001 .

[13]  Jochen Fröhlich,et al.  Highly resolved large-eddy simulation of separated flow in a channel with streamwise periodic constrictions , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  F. Grinstein,et al.  Large Eddy simulation of high-Reynolds-number free and wall-bounded flows , 2002 .

[15]  Chi-Wang Shu Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws , 1998 .

[16]  N. Adams,et al.  An approximate deconvolution procedure for large-eddy simulation , 1999 .

[17]  N. Adams,et al.  Implicit subgrid-scale modeling by adaptive deconvolution , 2004 .

[18]  A. Gosman,et al.  A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 1997 .

[19]  Wolfgang Rodi,et al.  Large eddy simulation of the flow over periodic hills , 2000 .

[20]  S. Ghosal An Analysis of Numerical Errors in Large-Eddy Simulations of Turbulence , 1996 .

[21]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Wake flows behind two-dimensional model hills , 1993 .

[22]  Steven A. Orszag,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Complex Engineering and Geophysical Flows , 2010 .

[23]  R. LeVeque Numerical methods for conservation laws , 1990 .

[24]  P. Moin,et al.  On the Effect of Numerical Errors in Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Flows , 1997 .

[25]  P. Sagaut,et al.  On the Use of Shock-Capturing Schemes for Large-Eddy Simulation , 1999 .

[26]  L. Margolin,et al.  MPDATA: A Finite-Difference Solver for Geophysical Flows , 1998 .

[27]  Franz Durst,et al.  Turbulent Shear Flows I , 1979 .

[28]  S. Stolz,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Separated Flow in a Channel with Streamwise-Periodic Constrictions , 2005 .

[29]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  An adaptive local deconvolution method for implicit LES , 2005, J. Comput. Phys..

[30]  D. Lilly,et al.  A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid‐scale closure method , 1992 .

[31]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  On implicit subgrid-scale modeling in wall-bounded flows , 2007 .

[32]  P. Moin,et al.  A dynamic subgrid‐scale eddy viscosity model , 1990 .

[33]  M. Manhart,et al.  Turbulent Channel Flow with Periodic Hill Constrictions , 2006 .

[34]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Direct modelling of subgrid scales of turbulence in large eddy simulations , 2002 .