Uncertainty of SWAT model at different DEM resolutions in a large mountainous watershed.

[1]  N. Fohrer,et al.  Simulation of streamflow and sediment with the soil and water assessment tool in a data scarce catchment in the three gorges region, china. , 2014, Journal of environmental quality.

[2]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Modeling impacts of climate change on freshwater availability in Africa , 2013 .

[3]  Qin Huang,et al.  A comprehensive study of the effect of GIS data on hydrology and non-point source pollution modeling , 2013 .

[4]  Zhenyao Shen,et al.  Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed , 2013 .

[5]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  Watershed modelling of hydrology and water quality in the Sacramento River watershed, California , 2013 .

[6]  O. Dam,et al.  Watershed modelling of hydrology and water quality in the Sacramento River watershed , California , 2013 .

[7]  Jinsong Guo,et al.  Impacts of climate and land-use changes on the migration of non-point source nitrogen and phosphorus during rainfall-runoff in the Jialing River Watershed, China , 2012 .

[8]  Lei Chen,et al.  Impact of spatial rainfall variability on hydrology and nonpoint source pollution modeling , 2012 .

[9]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Effects of urbanization on streamflow using SWAT with real and simulated meteorological data , 2012 .

[10]  Andreas Gericke,et al.  Improving the estimation of erosion-related suspended solid yields in mountainous, non-alpine river catchments , 2012, Environ. Model. Softw..

[11]  Joonwoo Noh,et al.  Impacts of GIS data quality on determination of runoff and suspended sediments in the Imha watershed in Korea , 2012, Geoscience journal.

[12]  Xuan Song,et al.  The Influence of DEM Resolution on Hydrological Simulation in the Huangshui River Basin , 2012 .

[13]  Zhenyao Shen,et al.  An overview of research on agricultural non-point source pollution modelling in China , 2012 .

[14]  Jiaping Wu,et al.  Evaluating DEM source and resolution uncertainties in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool , 2012, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[15]  Chen Lei,et al.  The influence of parameter distribution uncertainty on hydrological and sediment modeling: a case study of SWAT model applied to the Daning watershed of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region, China , 2012, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[16]  Carlo A. Furia,et al.  User manual , 2023, International Transport Forum Policy Papers.

[17]  Chien-Nan Wu,et al.  Evaluation of non-point source pollution and river water quality using a multimedia two-model system , 2011 .

[18]  Dingjiang Chen,et al.  Spatio-temporal variations of nitrogen in an agricultural watershed in eastern China: catchment export, stream attenuation and discharge. , 2011, Environmental pollution.

[19]  K. N. Tiwari,et al.  Determining the optimum cell size of digital elevation model for hydrologic application , 2011 .

[20]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[21]  G. Ghaffari.  The Impact of DEM Resolution on Runoff and Sediment Modelling Results , 2011 .

[22]  Xiaoyan Wang,et al.  Effect of DEM mesh size on AnnAGNPS simulation and slope correction , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[23]  Jun Li,et al.  Research on non-point source pollution spatial distribution of Qingdao based on L-THIA model , 2011, Math. Comput. Model..

[24]  A. Casper,et al.  Linking a spatially explicit watershed model (SWAT) with an in‐stream fish habitat model (PHABSIM): A case study of setting minimum flows and levels in a low gradient, sub‐tropical river , 2011 .

[25]  Qiang Zhang,et al.  An evaluation of impacts of DEM resolution and parameter correlation on TOPMODEL modeling uncertainty , 2010 .

[26]  Tong Jiang,et al.  Hydrological modeling of River Xiangxi using SWAT2005: A comparison of model parameterizations using station and gridded meteorological observations , 2010 .

[27]  Zongxue Xu,et al.  Analysis of parameter uncertainty in semi-distributed hydrological models using bootstrap method: a case study of SWAT model applied to Yingluoxia watershed in northwest China. , 2010 .

[28]  Yu Tao,et al.  Current status of agricultural and rural non-point source Pollution assessment in China. , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[29]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model , 2010 .

[30]  Giha Lee,et al.  Interaction between Topographic and Process Parameters due to the Spatial Resolution of DEMs in Distributed Rainfall-Runoff Modeling , 2009 .

[31]  K. N. Tiwari,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of contour interpolated digital elevation models , 2009 .

[32]  Barnali M. Dixon,et al.  Resample or not?! Effects of resolution of DEMs in watershed modeling , 2009 .

[33]  Johan Alexander Huisman,et al.  Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling (LUCHEM) IV: Model sensitivity to data aggregation and spatial (re-)distribution , 2009 .

[34]  David D. Bosch,et al.  Effect of spatial distribution of rainfall on temporal and spatial uncertainty of SWAT output. , 2009 .

[35]  Helge Bormann,et al.  Sensitivity of a soil-vegetation-atmosphere-transfer scheme to input data resolution and data classification , 2008 .

[36]  George Xian,et al.  An analysis of urban development and its environmental impact on the Tampa Bay watershed. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  Roger A. Falconer,et al.  Development of an integrated model for assessing the impact of diffuse and point source pollution on coastal waters , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  J. Vaze,et al.  Impact of DEM Resolution on Topographic Indices and Hydrological Modelling Results , 2007 .

[39]  Y Ouyang,et al.  Assessment of seasonal variations in surface water quality. , 2006, Water research.

[40]  S. Wechsler.  Uncertainties associated with digital elevation models for hydrologic applications: a review , 2006 .

[41]  Mazdak Arabi,et al.  ROLE OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON MODELING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES WITH SWAT 1 , 2006 .

[42]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Assessing the improvement of the Bilbao estuary water quality in response to pollution abatement measures. , 2006, Water research.

[43]  Vincent Chaplot,et al.  Impact of DEM mesh size and soil map scale on SWAT runoff, sediment, and NO3-N loads predictions , 2005 .

[44]  Helge Bormann,et al.  Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Impact of Spatial Data Resolution on Simulated Catchment Water Balances and Model Performance of the Multi-scale Toplats Model , 2022 .

[45]  B. Dixon,et al.  A Comparative Study Of The Effects OfInput Resolution On The SWAT Model , 2005 .

[46]  M. J. Booij,et al.  Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions , 2005 .

[47]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  Effect of GIS data quality on small watershed stream flow and sediment simulations , 2005 .

[48]  T. A. Costello,et al.  Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty , 2005 .

[49]  J. P. Kimmins,et al.  The choice of window size in approximating topographic surfaces from Digital Elevation Models , 2004, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[50]  Indrajeet Chaubey,et al.  WATER QUALITY MODEL OUTPUT UNCERTAINTY AS AFFECTED BY SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF INPUT DATA 1 , 2003 .

[51]  R. Govindaraju,et al.  Effect of geomorphologic resolution on modeling of runoff hydrograph and sedimentograph over small watersheds , 2003 .

[52]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  EFFECT OF WATERSHED SUBDIVISION ON SWAT FLOW, SEDIMENT, AND NUTRIENT PREDICTIONS 1 , 2002 .

[53]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Effect and uncertainty of digital elevation model spatial resolutions on predicting the topographical factor for soil loss estimation , 2002 .

[54]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Satellite-derived digital elevation model accuracy: hydrological modelling requirements , 2000 .

[55]  Bernd Diekkrüger,et al.  Scaling input data by GIS for hydrological modelling , 1999 .

[56]  Thomas A. McMahon,et al.  Large-scale distribution modelling and the utility of detailed ground data , 1998 .

[57]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[58]  Lawrence E. Band,et al.  Scale: Landscape attributes and geographical information systems , 1995 .

[59]  K. Beven,et al.  Sensitivity to space and time resolution of a hydrological model using digital elevation data. , 1995 .

[60]  D. Wolock,et al.  Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography‐based watershed model , 1994 .

[61]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Digital elevation model grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations , 1994 .

[62]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects , 1993 .

[63]  Ling Bian,et al.  Response of a distributed watershed erosion model to variations in input data aggregation levels , 1993 .

[64]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[65]  R. W. Hann,et al.  Optimal Operation of Large Agricultural Watersheds with Water Quality Restraints , 1978 .

[66]  John R. Williams,et al.  Sediment yield prediction based on watershed hydrology. , 1977 .

[67]  S. Chiu,et al.  Loading functions for assessment of water pollution from nonpoint sources. Final report , 1976 .

[68]  Peter P. Pratt,et al.  Archaeological Survey of the Flint Creek Project for the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service , 1974 .