Edge control in a computer controlled optical surfacing process using a heterocercal tool influence function.

Edge effect is regarded as one of the most difficult technical issues in a computer controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) process. Traditional opticians have to even up the consequences of the two following cases. Operating CCOS in a large overhang condition affects the accuracy of material removal, while in a small overhang condition, it achieves a more accurate performance, but leaves a narrow rolled-up edge, which takes time and effort to remove. In order to control the edge residuals in the latter case, we present a new concept of the 'heterocercal' tool influence function (TIF). Generated from compound motion equipment, this type of TIF can 'transfer' the material removal from the inner place to the edge, meanwhile maintaining the high accuracy and efficiency of CCOS. We call it the 'heterocercal' TIF, because of the inspiration from the heterocercal tails of sharks, whose upper lobe provides most of the explosive power. The heterocercal TIF was theoretically analyzed, and physically realized in CCOS facilities. Experimental and simulation results showed good agreement. It enables significant control of the edge effect and convergence of entire surface errors in large tool-to-mirror size-ratio conditions. This improvement will largely help manufacturing efficiency in some extremely large optical system projects, like the tertiary mirror of the Thirty Meter Telescope.

[1]  Jerrold Zimmerman Computer-controlled optical surfacing for off-axis aspheric mirrors , 1990, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[2]  Guoyu Yu,et al.  Edge control in CNC polishing, paper 2: simulation and validation of tool influence functions on edges. , 2013, Optics express.

[3]  F. W. Preston The Theory and Design of Plate Glass Polishing Machines , 1927 .

[4]  Maria H. Pedrayes,et al.  Edge effects with Preston equation , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[5]  Jingchi Yu,et al.  Edge effect in fluid jet polishing. , 2006, Applied optics.

[6]  Xiaoqiang Peng,et al.  Research on reducing the edge effect in magnetorheological finishing. , 2011, Applied optics.

[7]  Robert A. Jones Computer Controlled Optical Surfacing With Orbital Tool Motion , 1985, Other Conferences.

[8]  A. Cordero-Dávila,et al.  Edge effects with the Preston equation for a circular tool and workpiece. , 2004, Applied optics.

[9]  刘海涛,et al.  Edge effect modeling and experiments on active lap processing , 2014 .

[10]  M. Troy,et al.  Rolled edges and phasing of segmented telescopes. , 2011, Applied optics.

[11]  Dae Wook Kim,et al.  Parametric modeling of edge effects for polishing tool influence functions. , 2009, Optics express.

[12]  Xuejun Zhang,et al.  Optimized dwell time algorithm in magnetorheological finishing , 2015 .

[13]  Xiao Luo,et al.  Research on sub-surface damage and its stress deformation in the process of large aperture and high diameter-to-thickness ratio TMT M3MP , 2016, International Symposium on Advanced Optical Manufacturing and Testing Technologies (AOMATT).

[14]  张学军 Zhang Xue-jun,et al.  Layout Optimization of Equal-Force Supports for Ultra-Large Optical Fabrication , 2014 .

[15]  Victor Rupp The Development of Optical Surfaces during the Grinding Process , 1965 .

[16]  Jorge González-García,et al.  Calculating petal tools by using genetic algorithms. , 2006, Applied optics.

[17]  R. A. Jones,et al.  Optimization of computer controlled polishing. , 1977, Applied optics.

[18]  Hyug-Gyo Rhee,et al.  Modeling of edge tool influence functions for computer controlled optical surfacing process , 2016 .

[19]  Guoyu Yu,et al.  Edges in CNC polishing: from mirror-segments towards semiconductors, paper 1: edges on processing the global surface. , 2012, Optics express.