Material removal and subsurface damage studies in dry and lubricated single-point scratch tests on alumina and silicon nitride

Abstract The grinding of ceramics is an extremely expensive yet unavoidable process. This fundamental study was inspired by this need. The objective was to examine how the lubricants, that have been reported to contribute to high wear in normal tribological testing, contribute to material removal in single-point scratch tests which may be the basis of grinding. The material removal and subsurface damage in single-point, unidirectional scratch tests on alumina and silicon nitride in the dry and lubricated conditions were studied. The lubricants used were distilled water, tricresyl phosphate (TCP), mineral oil, cutting oil, NH 4 OH, and mineral oil with 1 wt.% of the following additives: chlorinated fatty acid, chlorinated fatty ester, chlorinated paraffin, and sulfurized lard oil. The material removal rate was found to be proportional to the load squared and was higher in alumina than in silicon nitride. The material removal rate was the highest in water for alumina and in mineral oil for silicon nitride. Water lubrication reduced the damage in silicon nitride but it promoted stress corrosion cracking in alumina under high loads. When scratching was done in NH 4 OH, the material removal rate in alumina was fairly high because of stress corrosion cracking. With TCP lubrication, the material removal rates in both ceramics were fairly high and there was no subsurface damage. The other organic lubricants led to lower material removal rates and little or no subsurface damage in both ceramics.

[1]  I. Hutchings Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials , 1992 .

[2]  A. Evans,et al.  Elastic/Plastic Indentation Damage in Ceramics: The Lateral Crack System , 1982 .

[3]  Shinya Sasaki,et al.  The effects of the surrounding atmosphere on the friction and wear of alumina, zirconia, silicon carbide and silicon nitride , 1989 .

[4]  S. M. Hsu,et al.  Effect of Selected Chemical Compounds on the Lubrication of Silicon Nitride , 1991 .

[5]  S. Jahanmir,et al.  Current problems and future directions for ceramic machining , 1996 .

[6]  I. Zarudi,et al.  Subsurface damage in alumina induced by single-point scratching , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[7]  K. Habig,et al.  Sliding friction and wear of ceramics in neutral, acid and basic aqueous solutions , 1993 .

[8]  Said Jahanmir,et al.  Simple technique for observing subsurface damage in machining of ceramics , 1994 .

[9]  Wei-Te Wu,et al.  Lubricated wear of silicon nitride , 1991 .

[10]  S. Jahanmir,et al.  Effect of Microstructure on Material‐Removal Mechanisms and Damage Tolerance in Abrasive Machining of Silicon Carbide , 1995 .

[11]  S. Jahanmir,et al.  Microfracture and material removal in scratching of alumina , 1995 .

[12]  Possible Explanations of Transient Neck Formation between Pairs of (100) Faceted Particles , 1996 .

[13]  Michael V. Swain,et al.  Microfracture about scratches in brittle solids , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  S. Jahanmir,et al.  Effect of grain size on scratch damage and hardness of alumina , 1995 .

[15]  S. Jahanmir,et al.  Influence of Grain Size on the Grinding Response of Alumina , 1996 .