Robotics improves alignment accuracy and reduces early revision rates for UKA in the hands of low-volume UKA surgeons
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Young,et al. Low percentage of surgeons meet the minimum recommended unicompartmental knee arthroplasty usage thresholds: Analysis of 3037 Surgeons from Three National Joint Registries , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[2] V. Digennaro,et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has higher revisions than total knee arthroplasty at long term follow-up: a registry study on 6453 prostheses , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[3] S. Lustig,et al. Is robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A case control study , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[4] N. Helmy,et al. Influence of patient selection, component positioning and surgeon’s caseload on the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2020, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
[5] C. Leelasestaporn,et al. Comparison of 1-year outcomes between MAKO versus NAVIO robot-assisted medial UKA: nonrandomized, prospective, comparative study , 2020, Knee Surgery & Related Research.
[6] H. Windhagen,et al. Clinical validation and accuracy testing of a radiographic decision aid for unicondylar knee arthroplasty patient selection in midterm follow-up , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[7] R. D. de Steiger,et al. The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.
[8] S. Young,et al. Low femoral component prominence negatively influences early revision rate in robotic unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[9] D. Murray,et al. The Effect of Surgeon Caseload on the Relative Revision Rate of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. , 2020, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[10] F. Haddad,et al. Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. , 2019, EFORT open reviews.
[11] Michael A Mont,et al. Revision Analysis of Robotic Arm-Assisted and Manual Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. , 2019, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[12] Wanshou Guo,et al. Risk factors of postoperative valgus malalignment in mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2018, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
[13] F. Haddad,et al. The learning curve associated with roboticarm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY , 2018, The bone & joint journal.
[14] P. Neyret,et al. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[15] A. Marx,et al. [Impact of Case Numbers on the 5-Year Survival Rate of Unicondylar Knee Replacements in Germany]. , 2018, Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie.
[16] P. Neyret,et al. Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique , 2017, International Orthopaedics.
[17] A. Ranawat,et al. Optimization of sagittal and coronal planes with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2017, The Knee.
[18] Man Soo Kim,et al. Differences in patient-reported outcomes between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties: A propensity score-matched analysis , 2017 .
[19] Y. In,et al. Differences in Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[20] M. Vasso,et al. Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Modes of Failure and Conversion to Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2017, Joints.
[21] K. Kang,et al. Importance of joint line preservation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis , 2017, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.
[22] S. Fuchs-Winkelmann,et al. Balancing mobile-bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty in vitro , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[23] J. Parvizi,et al. A New Classification for the Varus Knee. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[24] A. Lombardi,et al. Radiological Decision Aid to determine suitability for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2016, The bone & joint journal.
[25] P. Rowe,et al. Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. , 2016, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[26] B. Boonen,et al. Inter-observer reliability of measurements performed on digital long-leg standing radiographs and assessment of validity compared to 3D CT-scan. , 2016, The Knee.
[27] D W Murray,et al. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. , 2015, The bone & joint journal.
[28] D. Viggiano,et al. Minor varus alignment provides better results than neutral alignment in medial UKA. , 2015, The Knee.
[29] L. Labey,et al. Balancing UKA: overstuffing leads to high medial collateral ligament strains , 2015, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[30] Birgitte Espehaug,et al. Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals , 2014, Acta orthopaedica.
[31] H. Windhagen,et al. [Computer-assisted systems in total knee arthroplasty. Useful aid or only additional costs]. , 2014, Der Orthopade.
[32] J. G. Bonnin,et al. ARTHROPLASTY , 1956, Der Orthopade.
[33] M. Ritter,et al. Tibial loading after UKA: evaluation of tibial slope, resection depth, medial shift and component rotation. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[34] V. Sauleau,et al. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival? , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.
[35] P. Baker,et al. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[36] M. Neil,et al. Revision of minimal resection resurfacing unicondylar knee arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: results compared with primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[37] Jonathan H. Lee,et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relieves pain and improves function more than total knee arthroplasty. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[38] H.S. Gill,et al. Elevated proximal tibial strains following unicompartmental knee replacement--a possible cause of pain. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.
[39] H. Tsumura,et al. The effects of tibial component inclination on bone stress after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.