Gemeinsame Wissenskonstruktion - Theoretische und methodologische Aspekte

Zusammenfassung. Der Fokus dieser Arbeit liegt auf wichtigen theoretischen Perspektiven zur gemeinsamen Wissenskonstruktion: Die soziogenetische Perspektive, die kognitive Perspektive der Informationsverarbeitung, soziokulturelle und situierte Perspektiven, die Perspektive des argumentativen Diskurses sowie die Perspektive der kollektiven Informationsverarbeitung. Die einzelnen Perspektiven werden anhand ihrer Grundidee und zentraler Fragestellungen, theoretischer Aspekte zur gemeinsamen Wissenskonstruktion im Diskurs sowie der typischerweise verwendeten Methodologien beschrieben. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden Konsequenzen fur die Theoriebildung und empirische Forschung gezogen.

[1]  K. Kumpulainen,et al.  The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: an introduction to an analytic framework , 1999 .

[2]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[3]  Alexander Renkl.  Lernen durch Lehren , 1997 .

[4]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Design Principles for Distributed Knowledge Building Processes , 1998 .

[5]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Collaborative learning processes associated with high and low conceptual progress , 1996 .

[6]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Collaborating on contributions to conversations , 1987 .

[7]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[8]  S. Järvelä,et al.  The cognitive apprenticeship model in a technologically rich learning environment: Interpreting the learning interaction , 1995 .

[9]  Scott Lewis,et al.  Problem-Solving Strategies and Group Processes in Small Groups Learning Computer Programming , 1986 .

[10]  J. Greeno.  THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[11]  John N. Dorner,et al.  Supervised Play Practica with Children: A Program for Student Teachers. , 1980 .

[12]  William Ickes,et al.  "Social" Cognition and Social Cognition , 1994 .

[13]  U. Christmann,et al.  Components of the Evaluation of Integrity Violations in Argumentative Discussions , 2000 .

[14]  Angela M. O'Donnell,et al.  The Structure of Discourse in Collaborative Learning , 2000 .

[15]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Groups as problem‐solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition , 1993 .

[16]  Selma Leitão,et al.  The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building , 2000, Human Development.

[17]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  Laurie L. Levesque,et al.  Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams , 2001 .

[19]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[20]  E. Cohen,et al.  Producing Equal-Status Interaction in the Heterogeneous Classroom , 1995 .

[21]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[22]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[23]  C. Pontecorvo,et al.  Arguing and Reasoning in Understanding Historical Topics , 1993 .

[24]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[25]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities , 1994 .

[26]  T. V. Dijk.  The Study of Discourse , 1997 .

[27]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[28]  C. Boxtel,et al.  Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. , 2000 .

[29]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Verbale Daten : eine Einführung in die Grundlagen und Methoden der Erhebung und Auswertung , 1982 .

[30]  Lauren B. Resnick,et al.  Discourse, Tools and Reasoning , 1997 .

[31]  D. Perkins,et al.  Chapter 1: Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[32]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF READING Technical Report No . 628 ON THE LOGICAL INTEGRITY OF CHILDREN ' S ARGUMENTS ' , 2012 .

[33]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Peer interaction and learning in cooperative small groups. , 1982 .

[34]  J. F. Voss,et al.  Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels , 1996 .

[35]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[36]  D. Clements,et al.  Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments , 1992 .

[37]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries , 2001 .

[38]  J. Tudge.  When collaboration leads to regression-Some negative consequences of socio-cognitive conflict , 1989 .

[39]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  C. Miller,et al.  A theory of argumentative understanding: Relationships among position preference, judgments of goodness, memory and reasoning , 1993 .

[41]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Learning by Constructing Collaborative Representations: An Empirical Comparison of Three Alternatives. , 2001 .

[42]  Jos van der Linden,et al.  Gemeinsames Problemlösen in Gruppen , 1995 .

[43]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[44]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[45]  H. Mandl,et al.  Inert knowledge: Analyses and remedies , 1996 .

[46]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning , 1997 .

[47]  M. Chi.  Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide , 1997 .