Competitiveness of advanced and conventional biofuels: Results from least-cost modelling of biofuel competition in Germany

Techno-economic variables for advanced biofuels produced from lignocellulosic biomass have been scrutinized and combined with a newly developed transparent model for simulating the competitiveness between conventional and advanced biofuels for road transport in the medium to long term in Germany. The influence of learning effects and feedstock cost developments has been highlighted, including also gaseous fuels. Thorough sensitivity analyses were undertaken. Previously reported cost assumptions for advanced biofuels were found to have been too optimistic. The most cost-competitive biofuels for most of the time period remained conventional biodiesel and bioethanol, but the costs of these options and biomethane and Synthetic Natural Gas (bio-SNG) converged in the medium term and thus other factors will play a decisive role for market developments of biofuels. Feedstock cost uncertainties for the future remain a challenge for long-term planning, and low-cost short-rotation coppice may change the picture more than any other parameter. Of the advanced biofuels, bio-SNG was found significantly more cost-competitive and resource efficient than Fischer-Tropsch-diesel and lignocellulose-based ethanol, but still requiring a dedicated long-term policy. The results and the large sensitivities of biofuel competitiveness stress the need for more data transparency and for thorough sensitivity analyses of the results in similar system studies.

[1]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Solutions for a cultivated planet , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  A critical assessment of energy-economy-climate models , 2012 .

[3]  M. Dry,et al.  The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000 , 2002 .

[4]  C. Wene.  Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy , 2000 .

[5]  A. Faaij,et al.  Exploration of the possibilities for production of Fischer Tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification , 2002 .

[6]  Dag Martinsen,et al.  Biomass for transportation fuels--A cost-effective option for the German energy supply? , 2010 .

[7]  Fabio Menten,et al.  A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: The use of meta-regression analysis , 2013 .

[8]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  A review of uncertainties in technology experience curves , 2012 .

[9]  Sonia Yeh,et al.  Stimulating learning-by-doing in advanced biofuels: effectiveness of alternative policies , 2012 .

[10]  Genevieve Patenaude,et al.  The economics of short rotation coppice in Germany , 2012 .

[11]  Sonja Simon,et al.  Modelling sustainable bioenergy potentials from agriculture for Germany and Eastern European countries. , 2009 .

[12]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Energy and exergy analyses of the oxidation and gasification of carbon , 2005 .

[13]  Lena Neij,et al.  Cost development of future technologies for power generation--A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments , 2008 .

[14]  Robert J. Farrauto,et al.  Conversion of Residual Biomass into Liquid Transportation Fuel: An Energy Analysis , 2011 .

[15]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[16]  François Maréchal,et al.  Process design of Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG) production using wood gasification , 2005 .

[17]  Arnulf Grubler,et al.  Technology and global change , 1998 .

[18]  Kj Krzysztof Ptasinski,et al.  Exergetic evaluation and improvement of biomass-to-synthetic natural gas conversion , 2009 .

[19]  Guillaume Boissonnet,et al.  Second generation BtL type biofuels – a production cost analysis , 2012 .

[20]  H. Veringa,et al.  The production of synthetic natural gas (SNG): A comparison of three wood gasification systems for energy balance and overall efficiency , 2010 .

[21]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Energy crop production costs in the EU , 2009 .

[22]  Manuel Wickert,et al.  Long-term scenarios and strategies for the deployment of renewable energies in Germany in view of European and global developments , 2012 .

[23]  Marc Londo,et al.  Competition between biofuels: Modeling technological learning and cost reductions over time , 2010 .

[24]  Martin Börjesson,et al.  Global transport biofuel futures in energy-economy modeling: a review , 2013 .

[25]  Andreas Brekke,et al.  Environmental impacts and costs of woody Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) production and use — A review , 2011 .

[26]  André Faaij,et al.  Current and future economic performance of first and second generation biofuels in developing countries , 2014 .

[27]  Jean-Paul Lange,et al.  Fuels and Chemicals Manufacturing; Guidelines for Understanding and Minimizing the Production Costs , 2001 .

[28]  A. Faaij,et al.  Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term , 2005 .

[29]  Max Åhman,et al.  Biomethane in the transport sector—An appraisal of the forgotten option , 2010 .