Proactive Recommendation Delivery

The main purpose of Recommender Systems is to minimize the effects of information/choice overload. Recommendations are usually prepared based on the estimation of what would be useful or interesting to users. Thus, it is important that they are relevant to users, whether to their information needs, current activity or emotional state. This requires deep understanding of users' context but also the knowledge of the history of previous users' interactions within the system (e.g. clicks, views, etc.). But even when the recommendations are highly relevant, their delivery to users can be very problematic. Many existing systems require active user participation (explicit interaction with the recommender system) and attention. Or, on other side of spectrum, there are RS that handle recommendation delivery without any consideration for users' preferences of when, where or how the recommendations are being delivered. Proactive Recommender Systems promise a more autonomous approach for recommendation delivery, by anticipating information needs in advance and acting on users' behalf with minimal efforts and without disturbance. This paper describes our work and interest in identifying and analyzing the factors that can influence acceptance and use of proactively delivered recommendations.

[1]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Relevance judgments of mobile commercial information , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Patrick Wilson,et al.  Situational relevance , 1973, Inf. Storage Retr..

[3]  Yunjie Calvin Xu,et al.  Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality? , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Steve Benford,et al.  Investigating episodes of mobile phone activity as indicators of opportune moments to deliver notifications , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[5]  Roland Bader,et al.  A Study on Proactive Delivery of Restaurant Recommendations for Android Smartphones , 2011 .

[6]  Roland Bader,et al.  A model for proactivity in mobile, context-aware recommender systems , 2011, RecSys '11.

[7]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[8]  Naresh Kumar Agarwal,et al.  A context-based investigation into source use by information seekers , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Markus Zanker,et al.  Investigating User's Information Needs and Attitudes Towards Proactivity in Mobile Tourist Guides , 2015, ENTER.

[10]  Iis P. Tussyadiah,et al.  Tourists’ Attitudes toward Proactive Smartphone Systems , 2016 .

[11]  Yanyan Yang,et al.  A Proactive Personalized Mobile News Recommendation System , 2010, 2010 Developments in E-systems Engineering.

[12]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  Mobile Recommender Systems , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Tour..

[13]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Context-aware systems: the 'right' information, at the 'right' time, in the 'right' place, in the 'right' way, to the 'right' person , 2012, AVI.

[14]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Annika Hinze,et al.  Locations- and Time-Based Information Delivery in Tourism , 2003, SSTD.

[16]  Mari Carmen Puerta Melguizo,et al.  A proactive recommendation system for writing: helping without disrupting , 2007, ECCE '07.

[17]  Francesco Ricci,et al.  A Context-Aware Model for Proactive Recommender Systems in the Tourism Domain , 2015, MobileHCI Adjunct.

[18]  Aldo Gordillo,et al.  Enhanced recommendations for e-Learning authoring tools based on a proactive context-aware recommender , 2013, 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).