The power of book reviews: a simple and transparent enhancement approach for book citation indexes

Both citations to an academic work and post-publication reviews of it are indicators that the work has had some impact on the research community. The Thomson Reuters evaluation and selection process for web of knowledge journals includes citation analysis but this is not systematically practised for evaluation of books for the book citation index (BKCI) due to the inconsistent methods of citing books, the volume of books and the variants of the titles, especially in non-English language. Despite the fact that correlations between citations to a book and the number of corresponding book reviews differ from research area to research area and are overall weak or non-existent, this study confirms that books with book reviews do not remain uncited and accrue a remarkable mean number of citations. Therefore, book reviews can be considered a suitable selection criterion for BKCIs. The approach suggested in this study is feasible and allows easy detection of corresponding books via its book reviews, which is particularly true for research areas where books play a more important role such as the social sciences, the arts and humanities.

[1]  E Garfield,et al.  "Science Citation Index"--A New Dimension in Indexing. , 1964, Science.

[2]  A. L. Dunn,et al.  Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[3]  Terry D. Bilhartz.  In 500 Words or Less: Academic Book Reviewing in American History. , 1984 .

[4]  S. Bradford.  "Sources of information on specific subjects" by S.C. Bradford , 1985 .

[5]  Adrian Furnham.  Book Reviews as a Selection Tool for Librarians , 1986 .

[6]  Virgil L. P. Blake.  The role of reviews and reviewing media in the selection process: an examination of the research record , 1989 .

[7]  Jean McGruer Parker.  Scholarly Book Reviews in Literature Journals as Collections Development Sources for Librarians , 1989 .

[8]  J. Serebnick.  Selection and Holdings of Small Publishers' Books in Oclc Libraries: A Study of the Influence of Reviews, Publishers, and Vendors , 1992, The Library Quarterly.

[9]  魏屹东,et al.  Scientometrics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Big Data.

[10]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Use of Scholarly Book Reviews: Implications for Electronic Publishing and Scholarly Communication , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Y. Lindholm-romantschuk.  Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Flow of Ideas Within and Among Disciplines , 1998 .

[12]  Jeppe Nicolaisen,et al.  The J-shaped distribution of citedness , 2002, J. Documentation.

[13]  J. Nicolaisen.  The scholarliness of published peer reviews: a bibliometric study of book reviews in selected social science fields , 2002 .

[14]  Documentation , 2006 .

[15]  J. Hartley.  Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines: Research Articles , 2006 .

[16]  Juris Dilevko,et al.  Investigating the Value of Scholarly Book Reviews for the Work of Academic Reference Librarians , 2006 .

[17]  James Hartley,et al.  Reading and writing book reviews across the disciplines , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  Peter Williams,et al.  The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[19]  M. Koizumi.  Book selection by librarians and faculty through collection evaluation methods , 2010, Library and Information Science.

[20]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Book reviews in humanities research evaluations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..