Risk and the Public Acceptance of New Technologies

Our everyday world is constantly changing. Economic growth, globalisation and the continuous development of technology ensure that in all aspects of our lives — foodstuffs, energy, clothing, transport, health, employment, leisure, etc — established practices and equipment rapidly become obsolete and there are relentless pressures to innovate and ‘modernise’. In the majority of cases, these processes are driven by the capitalist market, as producers seek to shape consumer demand and as entrepreneurs champion new products and services. Part of the in-built dynamic of modern capitalism is that it is a profit-driven ‘growth machine’ characterised by perpetual technological innovation (Saunders, 1995). Such innovation consists of attempts to minimise or avoid technical problems with current machines and systems, and/or to increase cost efficiency, and/or to achieve radical breakthroughs to introduce completely new devices and methods. The shifts from coal to steam power, the availability of electricity, the evolution of motor vehicles and then air transport, the adoption of nuclear energy, the advance of computers and digital telecommunications, and new biotechnology industries are only a few illustrations of the fundamental transformations which have occurred in a relatively short historical period.

[1]  L. Clarke,et al.  Menus of Choice: the Social Embeddedness of Decisions , 2000 .

[2]  James Wilsdon,et al.  See-Through Science : Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream , 2004 .

[3]  R. Kasperson,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Introduction , 2003 .

[4]  A. Irwin Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences , 2001 .

[5]  K. Hobson Sustainable lifestyles: rethinking barriers and behaviour change. , 2001 .

[6]  A. Elliott Beck's Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment , 2002 .

[7]  Brian Wynne,et al.  May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. , 2004 .

[8]  L. Clarke Social Organization and Risk: Some Current Controversies , 1993 .

[9]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Risk As Globalising "Democratic" Discourse? Framing Subjects And Citizens , 2006 .

[10]  A. Webster State of the art , 2004 .

[11]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[13]  P. Bellaby To Risk or Not to Risk? Uses and Limitations of Mary Douglas on Risk-Acceptability for Understanding Health and Safety at Work and Road Accidents , 1990 .

[14]  B. Wynne,et al.  Introduction: Science, Citizenship And Globalization , 2005 .

[15]  A. Stirling Opening Up Or Closing Down? Analysis, Participation And Power In The Social Appraisal Of Technology , 2005 .

[16]  Ortwin Renn A Model for an Analytic−Deliberative Process in Risk Management , 1999 .

[17]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? public debate about transgenic crops , 2005 .

[18]  M. Siegrist The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  G. Rowe,et al.  Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation , 2000 .

[20]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[21]  C. Althaus,et al.  A Disciplinary Perspective on the Epistemological Status of Risk , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[22]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: The social amplification of risk: assessing fifteen years of research and theory , 2003 .

[23]  Susan Miles,et al.  The Media and Genetically Modified Foods: Evidence in Support of Social Amplification of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  M. Douglas Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory , 1994 .

[25]  Frank Furedi,et al.  Culture of Fear , 1997 .

[26]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm , 1992 .

[27]  Wouter Poortinga,et al.  Trust in Risk Regulation: Cause or Consequence of the Acceptability of GM Food? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  B. Wynne,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. , 1994 .

[29]  A. Wolfe,et al.  A Framework for Analyzing Dialogues over the Acceptability of Controversial Technologies , 2002 .

[30]  P. Bellaby What is genuine sickness? The relation between work‐discipline and the sick role in a pottery factory , 1990 .

[31]  W. Poortinga,et al.  Trust, the Asymmetry Principle, and the Role of Prior Beliefs , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[32]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  The politics of risk society , 1998 .

[33]  Iain Wilkinson Social Theories of Risk Perception: At Once Indispensable and Insufficient , 2001 .

[34]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.