Simulated MR magnetic field induces steady‐state changes in brain dynamics: Implications for interpretation of functional MR studies

We examined whether a magnetic field comparable to one of the fields produced during MRI induced steady‐state changes in brain electrical activity while the field was applied (called a presence effect to distinguish it from evoked potentials). The electroencephalogram was measured from standard scalp locations in the presence and absence of 100‐200 μT, 60 Hz, and the effect of the field was evaluated by nonlinear (recurrence analysis) and linear techniques; individual subjects served as their own controls. Using recurrence analysis, changes in brain activity lasting 1 sec (the longest interval considered) were found in 21 of 22 subjects (P < 0.05 for each subject). The presence effect was not detected using linear analysis and was reversible, as indicated by a return of brain activity to baseline levels in all subjects within 2 sec of field offset. The possible role of artifacts or systematic errors was ruled out by studies using electrical phantoms and by analyses of electroencephalograms recorded during sham exposure. It is reasonable to expect that actual scanner magnetic fields also produce nonlinear steady‐state perturbations of brain dynamical activity. The effect may influence the picture of brain connectivity inferred in some functional MR studies. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Brass,et al.  The What, When, Whether Model of Intentional Action , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[2]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[3]  D. Humphrey,et al.  Dynamic patterns of brain cell assemblies , 1976 .

[4]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Nonlinear EEG activation evoked by low-strength low-frequency magnetic fields , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Enhancement of long‐range EEG coherence by synchronous bifocal transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  F. Takens Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[7]  E. Basar Toward a physical approach to integrative physiology. I. Brain dynamics and physical causality. , 1983, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  M R Symms,et al.  Methodology: EEG-correlated fMRI. , 2000, Advances in neurology.

[9]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Localization of electroreceptive function in rabbits , 2003, Physiology & Behavior.

[10]  D. Ruelle,et al.  Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems , 1987 .

[11]  Charles L. Webber,et al.  Magnetosensory evoked potentials: Consistent nonlinear phenomena , 2008, Neuroscience Research.

[12]  M O Leach,et al.  Electromagnetic field exposure limitation and the future of MRI. , 2005, The British journal of radiology.

[13]  F. H. Lopes da Silva Neural mechanisms underlying brain waves: from neural membranes to networks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  G. Barker,et al.  Study design in fMRI: Basic principles , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[15]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Method for detection of changes in the EEG induced by the presence of sensory stimuli , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[16]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Magnetosensory function in rats: Localization using positron emission tomography , 2009, Synapse.

[17]  P E Rapp,et al.  A guide to dynamical analysis , 1994, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[18]  N. Logothetis What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI , 2008, Nature.

[19]  Karl J. Friston Volterra kernels and effective connectivity , 2003 .

[20]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  The Effects of Low-Frequency Environmental-Strength Electromagnetic Fields on Brain Electrical Activity: A Critical Review of the Literature , 2008, Electromagnetic biology and medicine.

[21]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Effect of routine MR imaging of the brain at 1.5 T on subsequent magnetoencephalography: results in nine volunteers. , 2004, Radiology.

[22]  Mark Hallett,et al.  High frequency rTMS modulation of the sensorimotor networks: Behavioral changes and fMRI correlates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[23]  Karl J. Friston The labile brain. I. Neuronal transients and nonlinear coupling. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[24]  W. J. Langford Statistical Methods , 1959, Nature.

[25]  E. Poole,et al.  Current practice of clinical electroencephalography D. W. Klass &D. D. Daly, Raven Press, 1979, 544 pp. $61.20 , 1980, Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Makeig,et al.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[27]  R. Leighton,et al.  Feynman Lectures on Physics , 1971 .

[28]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Action potentials from human neuroblastoma cells in magnetic fields , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  W. R. Adey,et al.  Tissue interactions with nonionizing electromagnetic fields. , 1981, Physiological reviews.

[30]  Andrew A. Marino,et al.  Evidence of a nonlinear human magnetic sense , 2007, Neuroscience.

[31]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Clifton Frilot,et al.  Evidence that transduction of electromagnetic field is mediated by a force receptor , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[33]  Ernst Nennig,et al.  Localizing and lateralizing language in patients with brain tumors: feasibility of routine preoperative functional MR imaging in 81 consecutive patients. , 2007, Radiology.

[34]  Andrew Chesson,et al.  Detection of nonlinear event-related potentials , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  etc.,et al.  Dynamic Patterns of Brain Cell Assemblies , 1974 .

[36]  Nicole A. Lazar Statistical Issues in fMRI Data Analysis , 2008 .

[37]  W. Freeman,et al.  How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world , 1987, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Dae-Jin Kim,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics of the EEG separated by independent component analysis after sound and light stimulation , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.