The ex ante assessment of knowledge spillovers: Government R&D policy, economic incentives and private firm behavior

This paper investigates the role of government R&D subsidy programs in stimulating knowledge spillovers. R&D subsidies are an effective public policy instrument when knowledge spillovers exist yet ex ante it is difficult to identify projects that have the greatest potential to increase innovation and economic growth. This paper derives a set of project and firm attributes that the literature finds generate knowledge spillovers and uses data on project proposals to estimate the degree to which a government R&D program conforms. We find that projects that were awarded R&D subsidies were more likely to have attributes such as participation in new research joint ventures and connections to universities and other firms. Following the post-award activities of firm, we find that receipt of a government R&D subsidy increased the funding from other sources when compared to firms that were not awarded funding.

[1]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy , 2001 .

[2]  A. Purvis,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1992 .

[3]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 1999 .

[4]  M. Spence Cost Reduction, Competition and Industry Performance , 1984 .

[5]  Y. Doz The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? , 2007 .

[6]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[8]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[9]  Michelle Gittelman,et al.  Does Good Science Lead to Valuable Knowledge? Biotechnology Firms and the Evolutionary Logic of Citation Patterns , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[10]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[11]  Kwanghui Lim,et al.  The many faces of absorptive capacity : spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips , 2000 .

[12]  M. Brewer,et al.  Intellectual Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises , 1994 .

[13]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1991 .

[14]  R. Nelson,et al.  American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry , 1994 .

[15]  D. Teece The Competitive challenge : strategies for industrial innovation and renewal : the Transamerica lectures in corporate strategy, School of Business, University of California, Berkely , 1987 .

[16]  宮本 光晴 Prices,Quality and Trust--Inter-firm Relations in Britain & Japan/Mari Sako(1992) , 1993 .

[17]  E. Hippel Sticky Information and the Locus of Problem Solving: Implications for Innovation , 1994 .

[18]  K. R. Harrigan Joint ventures and competitive strategy , 1988 .

[19]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[21]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the Sbir Program , 1998 .

[22]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING ON AGGREGATE INDUSTRY SPECIALIZATION , 1996 .

[23]  S. Wallsten The Effects of Government-Industry R&D Programs on Private R&D: The Case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program , 2000 .

[24]  Scott J. Wallsten,et al.  Rethinking the Small Business Innovation Research Program , 1999 .

[25]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[26]  Lewis M. Branscomb,et al.  Investing in innovation : creating a research and innovation policy that works , 1998 .

[27]  Z. Griliches,et al.  Do Subsidies to Commercial R&D Reduce Market Failures? Microeconomic Evaluation Studies , 1999 .

[28]  Andrew C. Inkpen The Management of International Joint Ventures: An Organizational Learning Perspective , 1995 .

[29]  Jennifer F. Reinganum The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[30]  Amy K. Glasmeier,et al.  Technological discontinuities and flexible production networks: The case of Switzerland and the world watch industry * , 1991 .

[31]  Diane M. Lander,et al.  The influence of voluntarily disclosed qualitative information , 2000 .

[32]  Manuel Trajtenberg R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment , 2000 .

[33]  Mari Sako,et al.  Supplier Relationships and Innovation , 1995 .

[34]  Cynthia R. Cook,et al.  The Institutional Context and Manufacturing Performance: The Case of the U.S. Defense Industrial Network , 1998 .

[35]  M. Kelley From Mission to Commercial Orientation: Perils and Possibilities for Federal Industrial Technology Policy , 1997 .

[36]  M. Feldman,et al.  Winning an award from the advanced technology program : : pursuing R&D strategies in the public interest and benefiting from a halo effect , 2001 .

[37]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[38]  R. Gulati,et al.  The dynamics of learning alliances: competition, cooperation, and relative scope , 1998 .

[39]  T A Watkins,et al.  In from the Cold: Prospects for Conversion of the Defense Industrial Base , 1995, Science.

[40]  D. Teece Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress , 1992 .

[41]  S. Winter Knowledge and Competence as Strategic Assets , 1987 .

[42]  M. Feldman,et al.  How States Augment the Capabilities of Technology–Pioneering Firms , 2002 .

[43]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Economic analysis of research spillovers implications for the advanced technology program , 1996 .

[44]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe,et al.  The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D* , 2003 .

[45]  M. Feldman,et al.  Fishing upstream: Firm innovation strategy and university research alliances , 2007 .

[46]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .