Understanding the key factors and configurational paths of the open government data performance: Based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis

Abstract The governments worldwide have attached great importance to open government data (OGD), and many OGD projects have emerged in recent years. However, the performance of OGD greatly differs in various districts and governments. Therefore, the influencing factors of OGD performance should be explored. However, the existing research has not yet established a systematic analytical framework for OGD performance, and the explanation degree of performance differences in OGD implementation is limited. Thus, this study takes technical management capacity, financial resource, organization arrangement, rules and regulations, organization culture, public demand, and inter-government competition as antecedent conditions under the perspective of technology–organization–environment framework and resource-based theory. From the cases of 16 provincial OGD practice in China, we employ fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to explore the influencing mechanism of the interaction and coordination of multiple conditions on OGD performance. Results indicate that OGD performance depends on the integration of the total effect of various factors. Moreover, four configurational paths could be utilized to achieve high OGD performance, namely, organization–balanced path, organization–environment path, balanced path, and organization–technology path. Furthermore, a substitution relationship exists among different conditional variables, which points out the direction and focus of the implementation of OGD for governments with different endowment characteristics. This study enriches the existing studies of OGD implementation and provides references for OGD practice.

[1]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[2]  Carsten Q. Schneider,et al.  Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 2012 .

[3]  Igbal Safarov,et al.  Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK , 2019 .

[4]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[5]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Factors affecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  F. Piller,et al.  Citizen Participation in Public Administration: Investigating Open Government for Social Innovation , 2019, R&D Management.

[7]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  The Sustainable Value of Open Government Data , 2019, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  A. Meijer,et al.  Open Government Data as an Innovation Process: Lessons from a Living Lab Experiment , 2019, Public Performance & Management Review.

[9]  Jing Zhang,et al.  Going Beyond Open Data: Challenges and Motivations for Smart Disclosure in Ethical Consumption , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[10]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Challenges and Concerns of Open Government , 2015 .

[11]  Joey F. George,et al.  Toward the development of a big data analytics capability , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[12]  Emad Abu-Shanab,et al.  Reengineering the open government concept: An empirical support for a proposed model , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[14]  Lihong Zhou,et al.  Proposing a framework of barriers to opening government data in China: A critical literature review , 2017, Libr. Hi Tech.

[15]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[16]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: Contradictory Findings and Their Possible Causes , 2014, MIS Q..

[17]  Grace Begany,et al.  Opening government health data to the public: benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from early innovators , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[18]  Victoria Wang,et al.  Exploring the extent of openness of open government data - A critique of open government datasets in the UK , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Richard M. Walker,et al.  Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A review and extension , 2014 .

[20]  Zhenbin Yang,et al.  What drives public agencies to participate in open government data initiatives? an innovation resource perspective , 2020, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  Legal and Institutional Challenges for Opening Data across Public Sectors: Towards Common Policy Solutions , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[22]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments , 2017 .

[23]  W. Powell,et al.  THE IRON CAGE REVISITED: , 1983, The New Economic Sociology.

[24]  Barry R. Weingast,et al.  Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History , 2009 .

[25]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Big data in the public sector: Uncertainties and readiness , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[27]  Frederika Welle Donker,et al.  How to assess the success of the open data ecosystem? , 2017 .

[28]  Charalampos Saridakis,et al.  Entrepreneurial orientation pathways to performance: A fuzzy-set analysis ☆ , 2016 .

[29]  Bo Fan,et al.  Exploring open government data capacity of government agency: Based on the resource-based theory , 2018, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Li Chunlin,et al.  Optimal scheduling across public and private clouds in complex hybrid cloud environment , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[31]  M. Friedman,et al.  Capitalism and Freedom , 1963 .

[32]  Liou,et al.  Improving the Sustainability of Open Government Data , 2019, Sustainability.

[33]  Bo Fan,et al.  The moderating effect of external pressure on the relationship between internal organizational factors and the quality of open government data , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[34]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective , 2016, Information Systems Frontiers.

[36]  Malcolm James Beynon,et al.  Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach , 2016 .

[37]  Xuejiao Zhao,et al.  Understanding the relationships between information architectures and business models: An empirical study on the success configurations of smart communities , 2020, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Jitka Komarkova,et al.  Big and open linked data analytics ecosystem: Theoretical background and essential elements , 2019, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  B. Wirtz,et al.  Resistance of Public Personnel to Open Government: A cognitive theory view of implementation barriers towards open government data , 2016 .

[40]  M. Fleischer,et al.  processes of technological innovation , 1990 .

[41]  Alana Maurushat,et al.  Opening up government data for Big Data analysis and public benefit , 2017, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[42]  Teresa M. Harrison,et al.  Transparency, participation, and accountability practices in open government: A comparative study , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Colin Elman,et al.  Qualitative Research: Recent Developments in Case Study Methods , 2006 .

[44]  J. Bryson,et al.  Putting the Resource-Based View of Strategy and Distinctive Competencies to Work in Public Organizations , 2007 .

[45]  Domonic A. Bearfield,et al.  Can You Find It on the Web? An Assessment of Municipal E-Government Transparency , 2017 .

[46]  Liang Ma Diffusion and Assimilation of Government Microblogging: Evidence from Chinese cities , 2012 .

[47]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users , 2017, Inf. Polity.

[48]  R. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis , 2005 .

[49]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  Open data in Kazakhstan: incentives, implementation and challenges , 2017, Inf. Technol. People.

[50]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Andrew B. Whitford,et al.  Assessing the Effects of Organizational Resources on Public Agency Performance: Evidence from the US Federal Government , 2013 .

[53]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[54]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[55]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Citizens’ attitudes toward Open Government and Government 2.0 , 2012 .

[56]  Roger H. L. Chiang,et al.  Big Data Research in Information Systems: Toward an Inclusive Research Agenda , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[58]  William D. Berry,et al.  Using Geographic Information Systems to Study Interstate Competition , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[59]  A. Ingrams,et al.  The legal‐normative conditions of police transparency: A configurational approach to open data adoption using qualitative comparative analysis , 2017 .

[60]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[61]  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[62]  Nina Schwarz,et al.  Urban Green Spaces and Housing Prices: An Alternative Perspective , 2019, Sustainability.

[63]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[64]  Hui-Ju Wang,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of Open Government Data at the Firm Level , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[65]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Redesigning social inquiry , 2008 .

[66]  Hart O. Awa,et al.  A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework , 2016, Inf. Technol. People.

[67]  Sebastiano Piccolo,et al.  Process Modularity Over Time: Modeling Process Execution as an Evolving Activity Network , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[68]  Xuejiao Zhao,et al.  What factors drive open innovation in China's public sector? A case study of official document exchange via microblogging (ODEM) in Haining , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[69]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level , 2011 .

[70]  Yukun Bao,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance and use of open government data (OGD): An empirical investigation in Bangladesh , 2019, Technology in Society.

[71]  Robert W. Palmatier,et al.  A Comparative Longitudinal Analysis of Theoretical Perspectives of Interorganizational Relationship Performance , 2007 .

[72]  Hui-Ju Wang,et al.  Adoption of open government data among government agencies , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[73]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[74]  Tung-Ching Lin,et al.  User Resistance to the Implementation of Information Systems: A Psychological Contract Breach Perspective , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Bo Fan Achieving horizontal integration of municipal e-government in China: assessment of managerial mechanisms , 2013 .

[76]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  A methodology for determining the value generation mechanism and the improvement priorities of open government data systems , 2016, Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst..

[77]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Social Mechanisms for Causal Explanation in Social Theory Based IS Research , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: A study in Taiwan , 2016, Gov. Inf. Q..

[79]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  Enhancing open government information performance: a study of institutional capacity and organizational arrangement in China , 2015 .