Characterizing a scientific elite (B): publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology

Science is principally driven by the efforts of a vanishingly small fraction of researchers publishing the majority of scientific research and garnering the majority of citations. Despite this well-established trend, knowledge of exactly how many articles these researchers publish, how highly they are cited, and how they achieved their distinctive accomplishments is meager. This article examines the publication and citation patterns of the world’s most highly cited environmental scientists and ecologists, inquiring into their levels of scientific productivity and visibility, examining relationships between scientific productivity and quality within their research programs, and considering how different publication strategies contribute to these distinctive successes. Generally speaking, highly cited researchers are also highly productive, publishing on average well over 100 articles each. Furthermore, articles published by this group are more highly cited on average than articles published in premier generalist journal like Nature and Science, and their citation to publication ratios are more equitably distributed than is typical. Research specialization and primacy of authorship are important determinants of citation frequency, while geographic differences and collaborative propensity matter less. The article closes with a set of suggestions for those wishing to increase the use of their research by the scientific community.

[1]  Birger Hjørland,et al.  Practical potentials of Bradford's law: a critical examination of the received view , 2007, J. Documentation.

[2]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[3]  A. E. Cawkell,et al.  Of nobel class, women in science, citation classics and other essays , 1993 .

[4]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis , 1996, Scientometrics.

[5]  Francis Collins,et al.  Scientists need a shorter path to research freedom , 2010, Nature.

[6]  W. Dennis Variations in Productivity Among Creative Workers , 1955 .

[7]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  The Awards of Science: Beyond the Nobel Prize , 1983 .

[8]  D. Edge Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Critical Review , 1979, History of science; an annual review of literature, research and teaching.

[9]  K. A. McKibbon,et al.  Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[11]  Erin E Leahey,et al.  Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings , 2007 .

[12]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Research Productivity over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists , 1991 .

[13]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Age and Scientific Performance , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  E. Garfield The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. , 2006, JAMA.

[15]  R. Wears,et al.  Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. , 2002, JAMA.

[16]  W B Bean,et al.  Age and Achievement. , 1960 .

[17]  Lawrence D. Fu,et al.  Models for Predicting and Explaining Citation Count of Biomedical Articles , 2008, AMIA.

[18]  M. Trifunac On citation rates in earthquake engineering , 2006 .

[19]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[20]  Erin Leahey,et al.  Gendered Academic Careers: Specializing for Success? , 2008 .

[21]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles , 2010, Scientometrics.

[22]  Julian Warner,et al.  A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises , 2000, J. Inf. Sci..

[23]  Amber E. Budden,et al.  The Influence of Author Gender, National Language and Number of Authors on Citation Rate in Ecology , 2009 .

[24]  Glenn D. Walters,et al.  Predicting subsequent citations to articles published in twelve crime-psychology journals: Author impact versus journal impact , 2006, Scientometrics.

[25]  Jack A. Goncalo,et al.  Creative Collaborations From Afar: The Benefits of Independent Authors , 2003 .

[26]  Gordon Parker,et al.  Can the Highly Cited Psychiatric Paper be Predicted Early? , 2009, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[27]  Niki Vermeulen,et al.  Collaboration in the new life sciences , 2010 .

[28]  Stephen Cole,et al.  Social Stratification in Science , 1974 .

[29]  J. Koricheva,et al.  What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers? , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Amber E. Budden,et al.  Does it pay to have a “bigwig” as a co-author? , 2008 .

[31]  Ronald N. Kostoff,et al.  The difference between highly and poorly cited medical articles in the journal Lancet , 2007, Scientometrics.

[32]  J. Koricheva,et al.  Does Scientific Collaboration Increase the Impact of Ecological Articles? , 2005 .

[33]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[34]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Problems of citation analysis , 1992, Scientometrics.

[35]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Quantitative Measures of Communication in Science: A Study of the Formal Level , 1986 .

[36]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Characterizing a scientific elite: the social characteristics of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology , 2010, Scientometrics.

[37]  Aparna Basu,et al.  Using ISI's 'Highly Cited Researchers' to obtain a country level indicator of citation excellence , 2006, Scientometrics.

[38]  M. Batty The Geography of Scientific Citation , 2003 .

[39]  D. Aksnes CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS , 2003 .