Effect of relationship experience on trust recovery following a breach

Significance Will people be more likely to forgive a breach of trust in an earlier or later stage of an interpersonal relationship? The present article reports behavioral and neurophysiological experiments that speak to this important question. Results show that trust recovery is facilitated with increasing relationship experience. Differential activation in the controlled social cognition system (C-system) and the automatic social cognition system (X-system) indicate that decision making is less controlled and more automatic following a later as opposed to an earlier trust breach. These findings have important implications for the study of trust recovery after a breach, as well as the neuroscience of trust. A violation of trust can have quite different consequences, depending on the nature of the relationship in which the trust breach occurs. In this article, we identify a key relationship characteristic that affects trust recovery: the extent of relationship experience before the trust breach. Across two experiments, this investigation establishes the behavioral effect that greater relationship experience before a trust breach fosters trust recovery. A neuroimaging experiment provides initial evidence that this behavioral effect is possible because of differential activation of two brain systems: while decision making after early trust breaches engages structures of a controlled social cognition system (C-system), specifically the anterior cingulate cortex and lateral frontal cortex, decision making after later trust breaches engages structures of an automatic social cognition system (X-system), specifically the lateral temporal cortex. The present findings make contributions to both social psychological theory and the neurophysiology of trust.

[1]  Neuroanatomy—An Atlas of Structures, Sections, and Systems , 1983 .

[2]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[3]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[4]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[5]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, trust, and democracy , 1993 .

[6]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Divergent Realities and Convergent Disappointments in the Hierarchic Relation: Trust and the Intuitive Auditor at Work , 1996 .

[7]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[8]  Motoki Watabe,et al.  Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in the United States and Japan1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[10]  J L Lancaster,et al.  Automated Talairach Atlas labels for functional brain mapping , 2000, Human brain mapping.

[11]  Daniel Houser,et al.  A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Allman,et al.  The Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Ralph Adolphs,et al.  Trust in the brain , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Steven E. Daniels,et al.  When Talk Is Not Cheap: Substantive Penance and Expressions of Intent in Rebuilding Cooperation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[15]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Promises and Lies: Restoring Violated Trust , 2004 .

[16]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Evidence-based and intuition-based self-knowledge: an FMRI study. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Conflict and Habit: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to the Self , 2004 .

[18]  Brian R. Dineen,et al.  The Road to Reconciliation: Antecedents of Victim Willingness to Reconcile Following a Broken Promise , 2004 .

[19]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[20]  M. Delgado,et al.  Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Yves von Cramon,et al.  Variants of uncertainty in decision-making and their neural correlates , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[22]  M. Paulus,et al.  Neurobiology of Decision Making: A Selective Review from a Neurocognitive and Clinical Perspective , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[23]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single‐subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self‐organizing group independent component analysis , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Integrating automatic and controlled processes into neurocognitive models of social cognition , 2006, Brain Research.

[25]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  A. Stinchcombe Cooperation Without Trust , 2006 .

[27]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Neural correlates of trust , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  B. King-Casas,et al.  The Rupture and Repair of Cooperation in Borderline Personality Disorder , 2008, Science.

[30]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  K. Cook,et al.  A Defense of Deception on Scientific Grounds , 2008 .

[32]  G. Pagnoni,et al.  The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Neural correlates of the rejection of unfair offers in the impunity game. , 2009, Neuro endocrinology letters.

[34]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Organizational neuroscience: The promise and prospects of an emerging discipline , 2010 .

[35]  René Riedl,et al.  Are There Neural Gender Differences in Online Trust? An fMRI Study on the Perceived Trustworthiness of eBay Offers , 2010, MIS Q..

[36]  Luke J. Chang,et al.  Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[37]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  How Implicit Beliefs Influence Trust Recovery , 2010, Psychological science.

[38]  K. Cook,et al.  The Role of Public, Relational and Organizational Trust in Economic Affairs , 2010 .

[39]  James H. Liu,et al.  Unbalanced triangle in the social dilemma of trust: Internet studies of real-time, real money social exchange between China, Japan, and Taiwan: Trust in internet social exchange , 2011 .

[40]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Understanding the effects of substantive responses on trust following a transgression , 2011 .

[41]  Eveline A. Crone,et al.  Learning whom to trust in repeated social interactions: A developmental perspective , 2012 .

[42]  P. Avesani,et al.  Reputational Priors Magnify Striatal Responses to Violations of Trust , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.