Maximizing Information Transfer in SSVEP-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces

Compared to the different brain signals used in brain–computer interface (BCI) paradigms, the s teady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) features a high signal to noise ratio, enabling reliable and fast classification of neural activity patterns without extensive training requirements. In this paper, we present methods to further increase the information transfer rates (ITRs) of SSVEP-based BCIs. Starting with stimulus parameter optimizations methods, we develop an improved approach for the use of Canonical correlation analysis and analyze properties of the SSVEP when the user fixates a target and during transitions between targets. These transitions show a negative effect on the system's ITR which we trace back to delays and dead times of the SSVEP. Using two classifier types adapted to continuous and transient SSVEPs and two control modes (fast feedback and fast input), we present a simulated online BCI implementation which addresses the challenges introduced by transient SSVEPs. The resulting system reaches an average ITR of 181 Bits/min and peak ITR values of up to 295 Bits/min for individual users.

[1]  Vaegan,et al.  Visual evoked potentials standard (2004) , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[2]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  A High-Speed Brain Speller using steady-State Visual evoked potentials , 2014, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[3]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  L1-Regularized Multiway Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[4]  Peng Yuan,et al.  A study of the existing problems of estimating the information transfer rate in online brain–computer interfaces , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[5]  Mihaly Benda,et al.  Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review , 2018, Brain sciences.

[6]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Frequency Recognition in SSVEP-Based BCI using Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[7]  L. Piccini,et al.  A Wearable Home BCI system: preliminary results with SSVEP protocol , 2005, 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference.

[8]  David E Thompson,et al.  Performance assessment in brain-computer interface-based augmentative and alternative communication , 2013, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[9]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[10]  A. Engel,et al.  An independent brain–computer interface using covert non-spatial visual selective attention , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[11]  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang.  Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Practical Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Genome-Scale RNAi Research , 2011 .

[12]  Zhenghua Wu.  SSVEP Extraction Based on the Similarity of Background EEG , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online Adaptation of a c-VEP Brain-Computer Interface(BCI) Based on Error-Related Potentials and Unsupervised Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[15]  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang.  Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Acknowledgments , 2011 .

[16]  Xiaohua Douglas Zhang.  Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Optimal High-Throughput Screening , 2011 .

[17]  Po-Lei Lee,et al.  An SSVEP-Based BCI Using High Duty-Cycle Visual Flicker , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  Exploring motion VEPs for gaze-independent communication , 2012, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  High-speed spelling with a noninvasive brain–computer interface , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  R. Jha,et al.  Influence of stimuli color on steady-state visual evoked potentials based BCI wheelchair control , 2013 .

[21]  Hongtao Wang,et al.  Remote control of an electrical car with SSVEP-Based BCI , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Information Theory and Information Security.

[22]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A brain–computer interface using motion-onset visual evoked potential , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[23]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  SSVEP-based Bremen–BCI interface—boosting information transfer rates , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[24]  D. Regan.  Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  Xiaogang Chen,et al.  Filter bank canonical correlation analysis for implementing a high-speed SSVEP-based brain–computer interface , 2015, Journal of neural engineering.

[26]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Frequency and Phase Mixed Coding in SSVEP-Based Brain--Computer Interface , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Visual and Auditory Brain–Computer Interfaces , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  Yijun Wang,et al.  A high-speed BCI based on code modulation VEP , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[29]  Yijun Wang,et al.  VEP-based brain-computer interfaces: time, frequency, and code modulations [Research Frontier] , 2009, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[30]  Giuseppe Andreoni,et al.  A Robust and Self-Paced BCI System Based on a Four Class SSVEP Paradigm: Algorithms and Protocols for a High-Transfer-Rate Direct Brain Communication , 2009, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..