Monitoring and risk assessment for groundwater sources in rural communities of Romania (GROUNDWATERISK)

In the past 100 years, a decreasing rainfall trend has been recorded on Romanian territory, a trend that continues today. Therefore, realistic estimation of the groundwater resources is crucial, especially for the rural communities lacking the economic power to use alternative sources of drinking water. The groundwater sources used by rural communities in Romania generally originate directly from caves, wells or springs with no proper evaluation of the water quality. Groundwater is exposed to different pollutants, as bats' guano in caves, fertilizers in agricultural areas or livestock (cattle, sheep, goats, etc.) farms on the surface. On the other hand, the water extracted directly from inside the caves is affecting groundwater ecosystems, highly vulnerable to any human impact and neglected by European legislation so far. The project aims to monitor, during two consecutive years, groundwater sources with different degrees of aboveand underground pollution, from different regions of Romania. To achieve the goals of the project, a multidisciplinary monitoring strategy that will include measurements of hydrological, physico-chemical and biological (microbiology and aquatic invertebrates’ assessment) parameters alongside the quantification of radon and stable isotopes, rainfall or possible inflows of water. The ‡ § |

[1]  G. Bitton Microbiology of Drinking Water: Production and Distribution , 2014 .

[2]  O. Moldovan,et al.  Novel approach to microbiological air monitoring in show caves , 2018, Aerobiologia.

[3]  M. Almasri,et al.  Assessment of intrinsic vulnerability to contamination for Gaza coastal aquifer, Palestine. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Terry P. Dawson,et al.  A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[5]  K. Rudi,et al.  Investigating antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and microbial contaminants in groundwater in relation to the proximity of urban areas. , 2018, Environmental pollution.

[6]  Kelly Newton,et al.  Metagenomic comparison of microbial communities inhabiting confined and unconfined aquifer ecosystems. , 2012, Environmental microbiology.

[7]  Z. Mimi,et al.  Intrinsic vulnerability, hazard and risk mapping for karst aquifers: A case study , 2009 .

[8]  Anat Thapinta,et al.  Use of geographic information systems for assessing groundwater pollution potential by pesticides in Central Thailand. , 2003, Environment international.

[9]  S. Silvestri,et al.  Framing the Flow: Innovative Approaches to Understand, Protect, and Value Ecosystem Services Across Linked Habitats , 2010 .

[10]  J. Dat,et al.  Survival of pathogenic and indicator organisms in groundwater and landfill leachate through coupling bacterial enumeration with tracer tests , 2010 .

[11]  C. Müller,et al.  LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: Part II – Model evaluation , 2017 .

[12]  L. Gill,et al.  Development of a microbial contamination susceptibility model for private domestic groundwater sources , 2012 .

[13]  C. Cosma,et al.  Radon in water from Transylvania (Romania) , 2008 .

[14]  F. J. Avelar-González,et al.  Waterborne Pathogens: Detection Methods and Challenges , 2015, Pathogens.

[15]  J. Frizenschaf,et al.  Groundwater Risk Assessment Model (GRAM): Groundwater Risk Assessment Model for Wellfield Protection , 2013 .

[16]  S. Trumbore,et al.  Functional diversity of microbial communities in pristine aquifers inferred by PLFA- and sequencing-based approaches , 2016 .

[17]  C. Müller,et al.  LPJmL4 – a dynamic global vegetation model with managed land: Part I – Model description , 2017 .

[18]  Lammert Kooistra,et al.  Environmental risk mapping of pollutants: state of the art and communication aspects. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Wells provide a distorted view of life in the aquifer: implications for sampling, monitoring and assessment of groundwater ecosystems , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[20]  N. Goldscheider,et al.  Proposed Methodology of Vulnerability and Contamination Risk Mapping for the Protection of Karst Aquifers in Slovenia , 2007 .

[21]  I. Miettinen,et al.  Microbial Contamination of Groundwater at Small Community Water Supplies in Finland , 2011, Ambio.

[22]  B. Andreo,et al.  Proposed method for groundwater vulnerability mapping in carbonate (karstic) aquifers: the COP method , 2006 .

[23]  G. Kendall,et al.  Doses to organs and tissues from radon and its decay products , 2002 .

[24]  Gary W. Johnson,et al.  A Methodology for Adaptable and Robust Ecosystem Services Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Services : Exploring a Geographical Perspective , 2022 .

[26]  Massimo Civita,et al.  The Combined Approach When Assessing and Mapping Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination , 2010 .