Flexible operation of low-inertia power systems connected via high voltage direct current interconnectors

Abstract The replacement of conventional synchronous generators with converter-interfaced generation units calls for increased amounts of flexibility. This paper proposes a novel formulation of the security-constrained unit commitment (SCUC) model applied to a multi-area power system connected via High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) links. From a system perspective, this paper provides a critical analysis of the synergies and differences between the exploitation of thermostatic loads and HVDC links when providing different layers of flexibility to the system. The former units operate within a local dimension, while the latter enable cross-border exchange of flexibility. Eight different ancillary services are modelled to tackle generation/load outages and uncertainty/variability in renewable energy output. The model is applied to the Great Britain network, which is connected to the Irish network and to the one in Continental Europe. Results suggest a critical review of the operation of future low-carbon HVDC-interconnected systems. Feasibility studies on the benefit for interconnection should no longer neglect considerations on local post-fault frequency dynamics in each area of the system. Then, fundamental changes to the mechanisms that price ancillary services become necessary in order to align these mechanisms with the technical needs of the system.

[1]  Paul Smith,et al.  Studying the Maximum Instantaneous Non-Synchronous Generation in an Island System—Frequency Stability Challenges in Ireland , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Marko Aunedi,et al.  Economic and Environmental Benefits of Dynamic Demand in Providing Frequency Regulation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[3]  Madeleine Gibescu,et al.  Stabilising system frequency using HVDC between the Continental European, Nordic, and Great Britain systems , 2016 .

[4]  N. Menemenlis,et al.  Methodologies to Determine Operating Reserves Due to Increased Wind Power , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[5]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Market-Based Coordination of Thermostatically Controlled Loads—Part I: A Mechanism Design Formulation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Tilman Weckesser,et al.  Market Integration of HVDC Lines: Internalizing HVDC Losses in Market Clearing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  F. Johnsson,et al.  Impacts of electric vehicles on the electricity generation portfolio – A Scandinavian-German case study , 2019, Applied Energy.

[8]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Short-term integration costs of variable renewable energy: Wind curtailment and balancing in Britain and Germany , 2018 .

[9]  D. Kirschen,et al.  A Survey of Frequency and Voltage Control Ancillary Services—Part I: Technical Features , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  Kjetil Uhlen,et al.  Flexibility needs in the future power system , 2019 .

[11]  Gengyin Li,et al.  Stochastic Unit Commitment of Wind-Integrated Power System Considering Air-Conditioning Loads for Demand Response , 2017 .

[12]  Thierry Van Cutsem,et al.  Decentralized model predictive control of voltage source converters for AC frequency containment , 2018, International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems.

[13]  William D'haeseleer,et al.  Unit commitment constraints in long-term planning models: Relevance, pitfalls and the role of assumptions on flexibility , 2020 .

[14]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[15]  Nadia Maïzi,et al.  Embedding power system’s reliability within a long-term Energy System Optimization Model: Linking high renewable energy integration and future grid stability for France by 2050 , 2020, Applied Energy.

[16]  T. K. Vrana,et al.  Review of investment model cost parameters for VSC HVDC transmission infrastructure , 2017 .

[17]  Jiakun Fang,et al.  Stochastic unit commitment with air conditioning loads participating in reserve service , 2019, IET Renewable Power Generation.

[18]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With AC/DC Transmission Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[19]  Goran Strbac,et al.  A system operator’s utility function for the frequency response market , 2018, Applied Energy.

[20]  Goran Andersson,et al.  Impact of Low Rotational Inertia on Power System Stability and Operation , 2013, 1312.6435.

[21]  Jun Liang,et al.  Hvdc Grids: For Offshore and Supergrid of the Future , 2016 .

[22]  Pieter Tielens,et al.  The relevance of inertia in power systems , 2016 .

[23]  Istvan Taczi,et al.  Effects of decreasing synchronous inertia on power system dynamics—Overview of recent experiences and marketisation of services , 2019, International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems.

[24]  Gianfranco Chicco,et al.  Probabilistic generation of time-coupled aggregate residential demand patterns , 2015 .

[25]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[26]  Michael Small,et al.  A Novel Control Strategy of DFIG Wind Turbines in Complex Power Systems for Enhancement of Primary Frequency Response and LFOD , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[27]  Adria Junyent-Ferre,et al.  Blending HVDC-Link Energy Storage and Offshore Wind Turbine Inertia for Fast Frequency Response , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[28]  Mingbo Liu,et al.  Modeling of Unit Commitment With AC Power Flow Constraints Through Semi-Continuous Variables , 2019, IEEE Access.

[29]  E. Karangelos,et al.  Towards Full Integration of Demand-Side Resources in Joint Forward Energy/Reserve Electricity Markets , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[30]  Jian Xu,et al.  Coordination optimization of multiple thermostatically controlled load groups in distribution network with renewable energy , 2018, Applied Energy.

[31]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Role and Benefits of Flexible Thermostatically Controlled Loads in Future Low-Carbon Systems , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[32]  M. Webber,et al.  Understanding the impact of non-synchronous wind and solar generation on grid stability and identifying mitigation pathways , 2020 .

[33]  Balarko Chaudhuri,et al.  Dynamic Overload Capability of VSC HVDC Interconnections for Frequency Support , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[34]  Yi Ding,et al.  Multi-state operating reserve model of aggregate thermostatically-controlled-loads for power system short-term reliability evaluation , 2019, Applied Energy.

[35]  Goran Strbac,et al.  A Mean Field Game Approach for Distributed Control of Thermostatic Loads Acting in Simultaneous Energy-Frequency Response Markets , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[36]  Dirk Van Hertem,et al.  Multi-terminal VSC HVDC for the European supergrid: Obstacles , 2010 .

[37]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Leaky storage model for optimal multi-service allocation of thermostatic loads , 2016 .

[38]  Remco Verzijlbergh,et al.  How do demand response and electrical energy storage affect (the need for) a capacity market , 2018 .

[39]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Unified Unit Commitment Formulation and Fast Multi-Service LP Model for Flexibility Evaluation in Sustainable Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[40]  Menglin Zhang,et al.  Security Constrained Unit Commitment Considering Time Shift of Air-conditioning Load for Demand Response , 2019, 2019 4th International Conference on Intelligent Green Building and Smart Grid (IGBSG).

[41]  Meysam Qadrdan,et al.  Role of the GB-France electricity interconnectors in integration of variable renewable generation , 2016 .

[42]  Tilman Weckesser,et al.  Sharing Reserves through HVDC: Potential Cost Savings in the Nordic Countries , 2020, IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution.

[43]  Vincenzo Trovato,et al.  Unit Commitment With Inertia-Dependent and Multispeed Allocation of Frequency Response Services , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.