The impact of different natures of experience on risk perception regarding fire-related incidents: A comparison of firefighters and emergency survivors using cross-national data

The main purpose of this work consisted in comparing the risk perception of emergency survivors and firefighters regarding fires in domestic and public settings, since specific research on the perception of fire risks is scarce. The sample, recruited in the context of the BeSeCu study, comprised a total of 3446 subjects (survivors: n = 747; firefighters: n = 2699) from seven European countries: Germany, Italy, Poland, Sweden, Spain, the Czech Republic, and Turkey. Using the standardized self-report instruments BeSeCu-S (survivors) and BeSeCu-FR (firefighters), probability estimates regarding two fire-related emergency situations were gathered. The results showed that in both the survivor and firefighter sample, the estimates differed with respect to the type of fire situation: The probability of becoming a victim of a fire in a domestic setting was consistently estimated as higher than becoming a victim of a fire in a public setting, which is consistent with the ranking order of the objective risks. Furthermore, the firefighters' probability estimates concerning the two emergency situations were generally more accurate than the survivors' assessments, within the total sample and the country subsamples. This is mostly in accordance with research findings being in favor of the higher accuracy of expert judgments. The results of this study provide new insights concerning the risk perception of laypeople and experts, and the way different natures of experience influence the accuracy with which risks are perceived.

[1]  C. K. Mertz,et al.  Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[2]  H. Schütz,et al.  Risikowahrnehmung in der Gesellschaft , 2003, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[3]  Corinne Peek-Asa,et al.  Perceived risk of home fire and escape plans in rural households. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[4]  P. Slovic,et al.  FACTS AND FEARS: UNDERSTANDING PERCEIVED RISK.: P/3 , 1980 .

[5]  Brian J. Meacham,et al.  Accommodating perceptions of risk in performance-based building fire safety code development , 2000 .

[6]  M. Settanni,et al.  Disaster preparedness and perception of flood risk : A study in an alpine valley in Italy , 2008 .

[7]  W Kip Viscusi,et al.  Dead Reckoning: Demographic Determinants of the Accuracy of Mortality Risk Perceptions , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Glynis M. Breakwell,et al.  Relating risk experience, venturesomeness and risk perception , 1999 .

[9]  J. Savishinsky.  Trapping, survival strategies, and environmental involvement: A case study from the Canadian sub-Arctic , 1978 .

[10]  Susan L. Cutter,et al.  En-gendered fears: femininity and technological risk perception , 1992 .

[11]  G. Rowe,et al.  Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk: Myth or Reality? , 2001, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Tadeusz Tyszka,et al.  Risk perception in Poland: A comparison with three other countries , 1991 .

[13]  G. Prati,et al.  Risk perception of different emergencies in a sample of European firefighters. , 2013, Work.

[14]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Risk Communication , 1988 .

[15]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Diana Adler.  Society Of Fire Protection Engineers , 2016 .

[17]  H. Neuhauser,et al.  Mindestindikatorensatz zur Erfassung des Migrationsstatus , 2006, Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz.

[18]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  The Different Dynamics of Personal and General Risk , 2003 .

[19]  E. Brähler,et al.  Risk perception and emergency experience: comparing a representative German sample with German emergency survivors , 2015 .

[20]  E. Galea,et al.  Advancing disaster relief: Development of a self-report questionnaire for firefighters. , 2014 .

[21]  Edwin R. Galea,et al.  BeSeCu-S – a self-report instrument for emergency survivors , 2014 .

[22]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[23]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  Risk Perception by the Public and by Experts: A Dilemma in Risk Management 1 , 1999 .

[24]  A. Wåhlberg,et al.  Risk perception and the media , 2000 .

[25]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[26]  J. Maršálek,et al.  Flood Risk Management: Hazards, Vulnerability and Mitigation Measures , 2006 .

[27]  Bradley E. Belsher,et al.  Cross‐Cultural Differences in Risk Perceptions of Disasters , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[28]  Lennart Sjöberg,et al.  The Allegedly Simple Structure of Experts’ Risk Perception: An Urban Legend in Risk Research , 2002 .

[29]  Åsa Boholm,et al.  Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research , 1998 .

[30]  Michael J. Karter,et al.  FIRE LOSS IN THE UNITED STATES DURING 2009 , 2002 .

[31]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality , 2004 .

[32]  I Savage,et al.  Demographic influences on risk perceptions. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Brian J. Meacham.  Understanding Risk: Quantification, Perceptions, and Characterization: , 2004 .

[34]  J. Dabbs,et al.  Testosterone and the work of firefighters: Fighting fires and delivering medical care ☆ , 2003 .

[35]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[36]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Newspaper Coverage of Causes of Death , 1979 .

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[38]  Andrea Gielen,et al.  Newspaper coverage of residential fires: an opportunity for prevention communication , 2007, Injury Prevention.

[39]  S. Feldman,et al.  The consequences of terrorism: disentangling the effects of personal and national threat , 2002 .

[40]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of risk: the influence of general trust, and general confidence , 2005 .

[41]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[42]  Lawrence C. Bank,et al.  Risk Perception in Performance-Based Building Design and Applications to Terrorism-Resistant Design , 2007 .

[43]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Some criteria for evaluating risk messages , 1993 .

[44]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Societal risks as seen by a Norwegian public , 1988 .

[45]  Daniela Knuth,et al.  Risk Perception, Experience, and Objective Risk: A Cross‐National Study with European Emergency Survivors , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[46]  Etienne Mullet,et al.  Risk Perception and Personality Facets , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[47]  George Wright,et al.  An Empirical Test of the Relative Validity of Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  N. Weinstein.  The precaution adoption process. , 1988, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[49]  H. Andersson,et al.  Perception of Own Death Risk: An Assessment of Road‐Traffic Mortality Risk , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .