A tandem CD19/CD20 CAR lentiviral vector drives on-target and off-target antigen modulation in leukemia cell lines

BackgroundClinical success with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)- based immunotherapy for leukemia has been accompanied by the associated finding that antigen-escape variants of the disease are responsible for relapse. To target hematologic malignancies with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that targets two antigens with a single vector, and thus potentially lessen the chance of leukemic escape mutations, a tandem-CAR approach was investigated.MethodsAntigen binding domains from the FMC63 (anti-CD19) and Leu16 (anti-CD20) antibodies were linked in differing configurations to transmembrane and T cell signaling domains to create tandem-CARs. Expression on the surface of primary human T cells was induced by transduction with a single lentiviral vector (LV) encoding the tandem-CAR. Tandem-CARs were compared to single antigen targeting CARs in vitro and in vivo, and to an admixture of transduced cells expressing each CAR in vivo in immunodeficient (NSG) disease-bearing mice.ResultsTandem constructs efficient killed the Raji leukemia cell line both in vitro and in vivo. Tandem CARs generated less cytokine than the CD20 CAR, but similar to CD19 CARs, on their own. In co-culture experiments at low effector to target ratios with both single- and tandem- CAR-T cells, a rapid down-modulation of full-length CD19 expression was seen on leukemia targets. There also was a partial down-modulation of CD22, and to a lesser degree, of CD20. Our data also highlight the extreme sensitivity of the NALM-6 cell line to general lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity. While single and tandem constructs were effective in vivo in a standard setting, in a high-disease burden setting, the tandem CAR proved both effective and less toxic than an admixture of transduced T cell populations expressing single CARs.ConclusionTandem CARs are equally effective in standard disease models to single antigen specificity CARs, and may be both more effective and less toxic in a higher disease burden setting. This may be due to optimized cell killing with more moderate cytokine production. The rapid co-modulation of CD19, CD20, and CD22 may account for the ability to rapidly evolve escape mutants by selecting for leukemic clones that not require these target antigens for continued expansion.

[1]  R. Kutner,et al.  Simplified lentivirus vector production in protein-free media using polyethylenimine-mediated transfection. , 2009, Journal of virological methods.

[2]  A. Bagg,et al.  Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  A. Jazirehi,et al.  CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CD19 CAR)-redirected adoptive T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas. , 2016, American journal of cancer research.

[4]  K. D. Hardman,et al.  An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[5]  S. Grupp,et al.  The Future Is Now: Chimeric Antigen Receptors as New Targeted Therapies for Childhood Cancer , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[6]  R. Rickert,et al.  CD19 Function in Early and Late B Cell Development. II. CD19 Facilitates the Pro-B/Pre-B Transition 1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[7]  M. Weiss,et al.  CD19 is a major B cell receptor-independent activator of MYC-driven B-lymphomagenesis. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[8]  K. Haas,et al.  A c-Myc and Surface CD19 Signaling Amplification Loop Promotes B Cell Lymphoma Development and Progression in Mice , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[9]  D. Teachey,et al.  Noninvasive bioluminescent imaging of primary patient acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a strategy for preclinical modeling. , 2011, Blood.

[10]  D. Teachey,et al.  Durable Remissions in Children with Relapsed/Refractory ALL Treated with T Cells Engineered with a CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CTL019) , 2015 .

[11]  J. Khan,et al.  CD19 CAR immune pressure induces B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia lineage switch exposing inherent leukaemic plasticity , 2016, Nature Communications.

[12]  W. Wilson,et al.  Construction and Preclinical Evaluation of an Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor , 2009, Journal of immunotherapy.

[13]  W. Wilson,et al.  Construction and Pre-Clinical Evaluation of An Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor , 2008 .

[14]  A A Raubitschek,et al.  Multimerization of a chimeric anti-CD20 single-chain Fv-Fc fusion protein is mediated through variable domain exchange. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[15]  M. Cragg,et al.  Antigenic modulation limits the efficacy of anti-CD20 antibodies: implications for antibody selection. , 2010, Blood.

[16]  Pradip Bajgain,et al.  Kinetics of tumor destruction by chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells. , 2014, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[17]  Bernd Hauck,et al.  Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Matthew L Baker,et al.  TanCAR: A Novel Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptor for Cancer Immunotherapy , 2013, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[19]  I. Pastan,et al.  Anti-CD22-chimeric antigen receptors targeting B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 2013, Blood.

[20]  W. Wilson,et al.  B-cell depletion and remissions of malignancy along with cytokine-associated toxicity in a clinical trial of anti-CD19 chimeric-antigen-receptor-transduced T cells. , 2012, Blood.

[21]  S. Grupp,et al.  Dual CD19 and CD123 targeting prevents antigen-loss relapses after CD19-directed immunotherapies. , 2016, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  M. Hurme,et al.  Surface membrane antigen expression changes induced in vitro by exogenous growth factors in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells , 2002, Leukemia.

[23]  D. Maloney,et al.  Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. , 2016, Blood.

[24]  V. Tybulewicz,et al.  CD19 is essential for B cell activation by promoting B cell receptor–antigen microcluster formation in response to membrane-bound ligand , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[25]  Yvonne Y Chen,et al.  T Cells Expressing CD19/CD20 Bispecific Chimeric Antigen Receptors Prevent Antigen Escape by Malignant B Cells , 2016, Cancer Immunology Research.

[26]  Seth M Steinberg,et al.  T cells expressing CD19 chimeric antigen receptors for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children and young adults: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[27]  L. Ginaldi,et al.  Levels of expression of CD19 and CD20 in chronic B cell leukaemias. , 1998, Journal of clinical pathology.

[28]  David Allman,et al.  Convergence of Acquired Mutations and Alternative Splicing of CD19 Enables Resistance to CART-19 Immunotherapy. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[29]  R. Rickert,et al.  CD19 Function in Early and Late B Cell Development: I. Maintenance of Follicular and Marginal Zone B Cells Requires CD19-Dependent Survival Signals1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  A. Wu,et al.  CD20 is a molecular target for scFvFc:zeta receptor redirected T cells: implications for cellular immunotherapy of CD20+ malignancy. , 1998, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[31]  S. Riddell,et al.  Receptor Affinity and Extracellular Domain Modifications Affect Tumor Recognition by ROR1-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.