fCite: a fractional citation tool to quantify an individual’s scientific research output

Here, I present the fCite web service (fcite.org) a tool for the in-depth analysis of an individual’s scientific research output. While multiple existing tools (e.g., Google Scholar, iCite, Microsoft Academic) focus on the total number of citations and the H-index, I propose the analysis of the research output by considering multiple metrics to provide greater insight into a scientist’s multifaceted profile. The most distinguishing feature of fCite is its ability to calculate fractional scores for most of the metrics currently in use. Thanks to the division of citations (and RCR scores) by the number of authors, the tool provides a more detailed analysis of a scholar’s portfolio. fCite is based on PUBMED data (~18 million publications), and the statistics are calculated with respect to ORCID data (~600,000 user profiles).

[1]  S. Schmid.  Five years post-DORA: promoting best practices for research assessment , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[2]  Farid Neema,et al.  Data sharing , 1998 .

[3]  L F Rogers.  Salami slicing, shotgunning, and the ethics of authorship. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[5]  George M. Santangelo,et al.  Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level , 2015, bioRxiv.

[6]  Iztok Fister,et al.  Toward the Discovery of Citation Cartels in Citation Networks , 2016, Front. Phys..

[7]  Siddhartha Jonnalagadda,et al.  Towards assigning references using semantic, journal and citation relevance , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine.

[8]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications , 2007, PLoS biology.

[9]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[10]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[12]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Marta Gwinn,et al.  A critical evaluation of the algorithm behind the Relative Citation Ratio (RCR) , 2017, PLoS biology.

[14]  Pradeep Ravikumar,et al.  A Comparison of String Distance Metrics for Name-Matching Tasks , 2003, IIWeb.

[15]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  Measuring institutional research productivity for the life sciences: the importance of accounting for the order of authors in the byline , 2013, Scientometrics.

[16]  Alexander Yong,et al.  A Critique of Hirsch's Citation Index: A Combinatorial Fermi Problem , 2014, 1402.4357.

[17]  Catriona Manville,et al.  Learning from the UK’s research impact assessment exercise: a case study of a retrospective impact assessment exercise and questions for the future , 2017 .

[18]  Luciano da Fontoura Costa,et al.  Patterns of authors contribution in scientific manuscripts , 2016, J. Informetrics.

[19]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time , 2016, ArXiv.

[20]  Xiang Liu,et al.  Charm physics — A field full of challenges and opportunities , 2008, 0808.2587.

[21]  George A. Lozano,et al.  The elephant in the room: multi-authorship and the assessment of individual researchers , 2013, ArXiv.