Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Haese* | U. Capitanio | F. Montorsi | T. Schlomm | H. Heinzer | M. Graefen | T. Steuber | H. Huland | S. Shariat | P. Karakiewicz | A. Erbersdobler | C. Jeldres | N. Suardi | P I Karakiewicz | F Montorsi | H Huland | A Erbersdobler | M Graefen | N Bhojani | S Ahyai | U Capitanio | N Suardi | S F Shariat | C Jeldres | T Schlomm | A Haese | T Steuber | H Heinzer | N. Bhojani | S. Ahyai
[1] C. Roehrborn,et al. Differences in the rate of lymph node invasion in men with clinically localized prostate cancer might be related to the continent of origin , 2007, BJU international.
[2] U. Capitanio,et al. Clinicians are most familiar with nomograms and rate their clinical usefulness highest, look-up tables are second best. , 2008, European urology.
[3] U. Capitanio,et al. Impact of surgical volume on the rate of lymph node metastases in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2008, European urology.
[4] C. Roehrborn,et al. Significant upgrading affects a third of men diagnosed with prostate cancer: predictive nomogram and internal validation , 2006, BJU international.
[5] Michael McCormack,et al. Validation of 1997 Partin Tables' lymph node invasion predictions in men treated with radical prostatectomy in Montreal Quebec. , 2005, The Canadian journal of urology.
[6] R. V. D. van den Bergh,et al. Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study. , 2007, European urology.
[7] Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al. Initial biopsy outcome prediction--head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. , 2007, European urology.
[8] D. Chan,et al. The use of prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason score to predict pathological stage in men with localized prostate cancer. , 1993, The Journal of urology.
[9] M. Roobol,et al. Active surveillance for prostate cancers detected in three subsequent rounds of a screening trial: characteristics, PSA doubling times, and outcome. , 2007, European urology.
[10] Alan W Partin,et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. , 2007, Urology.
[11] A. Haese*,et al. Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men , 2008, Cancer.
[12] M. Barchitta,et al. Active surveillance of nosocomial infections in urologic patients. , 2007, European urology.
[13] F. Montorsi,et al. A nomogram for staging of exclusive nonobturator lymph node metastases in men with localized prostate cancer. , 2007, European urology.
[14] Stefan Conrad,et al. Prospective validation of an algorithm with systematic sextant biopsy to predict pelvic lymph node metastasis in patients with clinically localized prostatic carcinoma. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[15] James M Henning,et al. How well does the Partin nomogram predict pathological stage after radical prostatectomy in a community based population? Results of the cancer of the prostate strategic urological research endeavor. , 2002, The Journal of urology.
[16] F. Montorsi,et al. Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. , 2006, European urology.
[17] A. Haese*,et al. Validation of a nomogram for prediction of side specific extracapsular extension at radical prostatectomy. , 2006, The Journal of urology.
[18] U. Capitanio,et al. Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence. , 2008, European urology.
[19] M. Kattan. Re: Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy gleason score (Partin Tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005. , 2007, European urology.
[20] A. Shalhav,et al. External validation of a nomogram for prediction of side-specific extracapsular extension at robotic radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of endourology.
[21] F. Montorsi,et al. Development and split-sample validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy. , 2007, European urology.
[22] A W Partin,et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. , 1997, JAMA.
[23] Pierre I Karakiewicz,et al. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer. , 2004, The Journal of urology.
[24] A. Haese*,et al. Transition zone cancers undermine the predictive accuracy of Partin table stage predictions. , 2005, The Journal of urology.
[25] K. Haustermans,et al. A pretreatment table for the prediction of final histopathology after radical prostatectomy in clinical unilateral T3a prostate cancer. , 2007, European urology.
[26] A W Partin,et al. Contemporary update of prostate cancer staging nomograms (Partin Tables) for the new millennium. , 2002, Urology.
[27] Michel Bolla,et al. [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer]. , 2009, Actas urologicas espanolas.
[28] Michael McCormack,et al. Development and internal validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. , 2006, European urology.