Predicting ongoing pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI: a national prospective study.

BACKGROUND The Dutch IVF guideline suggests triage of patients for IVF based on diagnostic category, duration of infertility and female age. There is no evidence for the effectiveness of these criteria. We evaluated the predictive value of patient characteristics that are used in the Dutch IVF guideline and developed a model that predicts the IVF ongoing pregnancy chance within 12 months. METHODS In a national prospective cohort study, pregnancy chances after IVF and ICSI treatment were assessed. Couples eligible for IVF or ICSI were followed during 12 months, using the databases of 11 IVF centres and 20 transport IVF clinics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate the cumulative probability of an ongoing pregnancy, and Cox regression was used for assessing the effects of predictors of pregnancy. RESULTS 4928 couples starting IVF/ICSI treatment were prospectively followed. On average, couples had 1.8 cycles in 12 months for both IVF and ICSI. The 1-year probability of ongoing pregnancy was 44.8% (95% CI 42.1-47.5%). ICSI for severe oligospermia had a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate than IVF indicated treatments, with a multivariate Hazard ratio (HR) of 1.22 (95% CI 1.07-1.39). The success rates were comparable for all diagnostic categories of IVF. The highest success rate is at age 30, with a slight decline towards younger women and women up to 35 and a sharp drop after 35. Primary subfertility with a HR of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.99) and duration of subfertility with a HR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99) per year significantly affected the pregnancy chance. CONCLUSIONS The most important predictors of the pregnancy chance after IVF and ICSI are women's age and ICSI. The diagnostic category is of no consequence. Duration of subfertility and pregnancy history are of limited prognostic value.

[1]  D. Barad,et al.  Unexplained infertility: does it really exist? , 2006, Human reproduction.

[2]  F. V. van Leeuwen,et al.  Effects of subfertility cause, smoking and body weight on the success rate of IVF. , 2005, Human reproduction.

[3]  S. Daya Life table (survival) analysis to generate cumulative pregnancy rates in assisted reproduction: are we overestimating our success rates? , 2005, Human reproduction.

[4]  J. Habbema,et al.  The antral follicle count is a better marker than basal follicle-stimulating hormone for the selection of older patients with acceptable pregnancy prospects after in vitro fertilization. , 2005, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  H. Klonoff-Cohen Female and male lifestyle habits and IVF: what is known and unknown. , 2005, Human reproduction update.

[6]  J. Kremer,et al.  Reasons for dropout in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[7]  M. Eijkemans,et al.  The Added Value of Embryo Cryopreservation to Cumulative Ongoing Pregnancy Rates Per IVF Treatment: Is Cryopreservation Worth the Effort? , 2002, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[8]  Marinus J C Eijkemans,et al.  A prediction model for selecting patients undergoing in vitro fertilization for elective single embryo transfer. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  G. Zielhuis,et al.  The effect of anxiety and depression on the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[10]  P. Braude,et al.  Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male-factor infertility: a randomised controlled trial , 2001, The Lancet.

[11]  P. De Sutter,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients continuing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment and dropouts. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  A. V. van Heusden,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rates and selective drop-out of patients in in-vitro fertilization treatment. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[13]  J. Collins,et al.  The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples: the Walcheren primary care study. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[14]  Joan K. Morris,et al.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment , 1996, The Lancet.

[15]  A. Verbeek,et al.  Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[16]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[17]  D. Seidman,et al.  Cumulative pregnancy rate following in-vitro fertilization: the significance of age and infertility aetiology. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[18]  A. Willan,et al.  The prognosis for live birth among untreated infertile couples. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  N. Naaktgeboren,et al.  Results of IYF from a prospective multicentre study , 1991 .

[20]  F. Harrell,et al.  Regression models in clinical studies: determining relationships between predictors and response. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  S. Bhattacharya,et al.  In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[22]  A. Wetzels,et al.  Cumulative probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection according to a woman's age, subfertility diagnosis and primary or secondary subfertility. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[23]  J. Habbema,et al.  The prediction of the chance to conceive in subfertile couples. , 1994, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  N. Naaktgeboren,et al.  Results of IVF from a prospective multicentre study. , 1991, Human reproduction.