Stochastic dynamic prediction

Stochastic dynamic prediction assumes the laws governing atmospheric behavior are entirely deterministic, but seeks solutions corresponding to probabilistic statements of the initial conditions, thus recognizing the impossibility of exact or sufficiently dense observations. The equation that must be solved is the continuity equation for probability. For practical reasons only approximate solutions to this equation are possible in general. Deterministic forecasts represent a very low order of approximation. More exact methods are developed and some of the attributes and advantages of stochastic dynamic predictions are illustrated by applying them to a low order set of dynamic equations. Stochastic dynamic predictions have significantly smaller mean square errors than deterministic procedures, and also give specific information on the nature and extent of the uncertainty of the forecast. Also the range of time over which useful forecasts can be obtained is extended. However, they also require considerably more extensive calculations. The question of analysis to obtain the initial stochastic statement of the atmospheric state is considered and one finds here too a promise of significant advantages over present deterministic methods. It is shown how the stochastic method can be used to assess the value of new or improved data by considering their influence on the decrease in the uncertainty of the forecast. Comparisons among physical-numerical models are also made more effectively by applying stochastic methods. Finally the implications of stochastic dynamic prediction on the question of predictability are briefly considered, with the conclusion that some earlier estimates have been too pessimistic. DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00483.x

[1]  J. Wolfowitz,et al.  Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. , 1951 .

[2]  P. D. Thompson,et al.  Uncertainty of Initial State as a Factor in the Predictability of Large Scale Atmospheric Flow Patterns , 1957 .

[3]  K. Bryan A Numerical Investigation of Certain Features of the General Circulation , 1959 .

[4]  George W. Platzman,et al.  THE SPECTRAL FORM OF THE VORTICITY EQUATION , 1960 .

[5]  E. Lorenz Maximum Simplification of the Dynamic Equations , 1960 .

[6]  Barry Saltzman,et al.  Finite Amplitude Free Convection as an Initial Value Problem—I , 1962 .

[7]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[8]  Ferdinand Baer Integration with the Spectral Vorticity Equation , 1964 .

[9]  Ulf Grenander,et al.  On the Formulation of Statistical Meteorology , 1965 .

[10]  E. Lorenz A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model , 1965 .

[11]  A Causal Relation for Probabilities in Synoptic Meteorology , 1966 .

[12]  Edward S. Epstein QUALITY CONTROL FOR PROBABILITY FORECASTS1,,2 , 1966 .

[13]  André Robert,et al.  The Integration of a Low Order Spectral Form of the Primitive Meteorological Equations , 1966 .

[14]  H. Ellsaesser Evaluation of Spectral Versus Grid Methods of Hemispheric Numerical Weather Prediction , 1966 .

[15]  Some current projects for global meteorological observation and experiment , 1967 .

[16]  Thomas A. Gleeson,et al.  Probability Predictions of Geostrophic Winds , 1967 .

[17]  John A. T. Young COMPARATIVE PROPERTIES OF SOME TIME DIFFERENCING SCHEMES FOR LINEAR AND NONLINEAR OSCILLATIONS , 1968 .

[18]  E. W. Wahl A COMPARISON OF THE CLIMATE OF THE EASTERN UNITED STATES DURING THE 1830's WITH THE CURRENT NORMALS , 1968 .

[19]  A. Robert INTEGRATION OF A SPECTRAL BAROTROPIC MODEL FROM GLOBAL 500-MB. CHARTS , 1968 .

[20]  E. Lorenz The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion , 1969 .

[21]  Edward S. Epstein,et al.  The Role of Initial Uncertainties in Predicion , 1969 .