General equilibrium of an ecosystem.

Ecosystems and economies are inextricably linked: ecosystem models and economic models are not linked. Consequently, using either type of model to design policies for preserving ecosystems or improving economic performance omits important information. Improved policies would follow from a model that links the systems and accounts for the mutual feedbacks by recognizing how key ecosystem variables influence key economic variables, and vice versa. Because general equilibrium economic models already are widely used for policy making, the approach used here is to develop a general equilibrium ecosystem model which captures salient biological functions and which can be integrated with extant economic models. In the ecosystem model, each organism is assumed to be a net energy maximizer that must exert energy to capture biomass from other organisms. The exerted energies are the "prices" that are paid to biomass, and each organism takes the prices as signals over which it has no control. The maximization problem yields the organism's demand for and supply of biomass to other organisms as functions of the prices. The demands and supplies for each biomass are aggregated over all organisms in each species which establishes biomass markets wherein biomass prices are determined. A short-run equilibrium is established when all organisms are maximizing and demand equals supply in every biomass market. If a species exhibits positive (negative) net energy in equilibrium, its population increases (decreases) and a new equilibrium follows. The demand and supply forces in the biomass markets drive each species toward zero stored energy and a long-run equilibrium. Population adjustments are not based on typical Lotka-Volterra differential equations in which one entire population adjusts to another entire population thereby masking organism behavior; instead, individual organism behavior is central to population adjustments. Numerical simulations use a marine food web in Alaska to illustrate the model and to show several simultaneous predator/prey relationships, prey switching by the top predator, and energy flows through the web.

[1]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[2]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[3]  S. Bartell Influence of Prey Abundance on Size-Selective Predation by Bluegills , 1982 .

[4]  Bruce Hannon,et al.  A general accounting framework for ecological systems: A functional taxonomy for connectivist ecology , 1991 .

[5]  J. Shoven,et al.  Applied General Equilibrium Models of Taxation and International Trade , 1983 .

[6]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Limitations of Captive Breeding in Endangered Species Recovery , 1996 .

[7]  N. Myers Ecological economics: The science and management of sustainability , 1992 .

[8]  B. Hannon Marginal product pricing in the ecosystem. , 1976, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  J. Estes,et al.  Sea Otters: Their Role in Structuring Nearshore Communities , 1974, Science.

[10]  B. Hannon,et al.  The structure of ecosystems. , 1973, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Some personal reflections on the history of Bioeconomics , 1999 .

[12]  Andrew Paul Gutierrez Applied Population Ecology: A Supply-Demand Approach , 1996 .

[13]  Victor Ginsburgh,et al.  The Structure of Applied General Equilibrium Models , 1997 .

[14]  Ken Dennis Rationality in Economics: Alternative Perspectives , 1998 .

[15]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Protecting Endangered Species in the United States: Extinction, Recovery, and the Endangered Species Act , 2001 .

[16]  H. Odum,et al.  Self-Organization, Transformity, and Information , 1988, Science.

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[18]  B. Menge Foraging Strategy of a Starfish in Relation to Actual Prey Availability and Environmental Predictability , 1972 .

[19]  D. Jablonski,et al.  Extinctions: a paleontological perspective. , 1991, Science.

[20]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Avian Targets. (Book Reviews: New World Parrots in Crisis. Solutions from Conservation Biology.) , 1992 .

[21]  Thomas D. Crocker,et al.  Economic Valuation of Ecosystems , 1987 .

[22]  J. Simon,et al.  Extinction rates. , 1996, Science.

[23]  M. Ghiselin,et al.  The emerging discipline of bioeconomics: aims and scope of the Journal of Bioeconomics , 1999 .

[24]  P. Krugman Rationales for Rationality , 1998 .

[25]  N. Leader‐Williams Black rhinos and African elephants: lessons for conservation funding , 1990, Oryx.

[26]  Solé,et al.  Effects of habitat destruction in a prey-predator metapopulation model , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  D. J. Hall,et al.  Optimal Foraging and the Size Selection of Prey by the Bluegill Sunfish (Lepomis Macrochirus) , 1974 .

[28]  J. Tschirhart,et al.  Ecosystems, externalities, and economies , 1992, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[29]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[30]  Sven Erik Jørgensen,et al.  Structural dynamic model , 1986 .

[31]  Tinker,et al.  Killer whale predation on sea otters linking oceanic and nearshore ecosystems , 1998, Science.

[32]  Kooijman,et al.  The application of mass and energy conservation laws in physiologically structured population models of heterotrophic organisms , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  Janet Tai Landa,et al.  Bioeconomics of some nonhuman and human societies: new institutional economics approach , 1999 .

[34]  George Hendrikse,et al.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1989 .

[35]  R. Ulanowicz An hypothesis on the development of natural communities. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[36]  C. Perrings Conservation of mass and instability in a dynamic economy-environment system , 1986 .

[37]  Robert W. Bosserman,et al.  Energetics and systems , 1982 .

[38]  A. Inkeles,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. , 1968 .

[39]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment , 1995, Environment and Development Economics.

[40]  A. J. Lotka Contribution to the Energetics of Evolution. , 1922, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  H. Bossel Viability and sustainability: Matching development goals to resource constraints , 1987 .

[42]  B. Hannon,et al.  Total energy costs in ecosystems. , 1979, Journal of theoretical biology.