Evaluation of multigrid solutions for turbulent flows

A multigrid methodology has been recently developed in a NASA solver, FUN3D, and successfully applied for a wide range of turbulent flows, from simple two-dimensional geometries to realistic three-dimensional configurations. The methodology is applicable to structuredand unstructured-grid solutions and includes both regular and agglomerated coarse meshes. Significant speed-ups over single-grid computations have been demonstrated. In the current work, we report on a detailed evaluation of the solver performance in computing benchmark turbulent flows. For those benchmark computations, multigrid solutions are compared with the corresponding single-grid solutions in terms of time-tosolution characteristics measured in the same computing environment. Multigrid efficiency enables a detailed grid-refinement study of a turbulent flow around an airfoil that is reported in the Appendix.

[1]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  A Unified Baseline Grid about the Common Research Model Wing-Body for the Fifth AIAA CFD Drag Prediction Workshop , 2011 .

[2]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[3]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Development and Application of Parallel Agglomerated Multigrid Methods for Complex Geometries , 2011 .

[4]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Comparison of Node-Centered and Cell-Centered Unstructured Finite-Volume Discretizations: Inviscid Fluxes , 2011 .

[5]  James L. Thomas,et al.  Recent Advances in Agglomerated Multigrid , 2013 .

[6]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Improved Convergence and Robustness of USM3D Solutions on Mixed Element Grids (Invited) , 2016 .

[7]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[8]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[9]  Achi Brandt,et al.  Multigrid Techniques: 1984 Guide with Applications to Fluid Dynamics, Revised Edition , 2011 .

[10]  Boris Diskin,et al.  A critical study of agglomerated multigrid methods for diffusion on highly-stretched grids , 2011 .

[11]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Towards Verification of Unstructured-Grid Solvers , 2008 .

[12]  L Krist Sherrie,et al.  CFL3D User''s Manual (Version 5.0) , 1998 .

[13]  Hiroaki Nishikawa,et al.  Beyond Interface Gradient: A General Principle for Constructing Diffusion Schemes , 2010 .

[14]  Hiroaki Nishikawa Robust and accurate viscous discretization via upwind scheme – I: Basic principle , 2011 .

[15]  T. Hsieh,et al.  An Investigation of Separated Flow about a Hemisphere-Cylinder at 0- to 19-Deg Incidence in the Mach Number Range from 0.6 to 1.5 , 1977 .

[16]  Kelly R. Laflin,et al.  CFL3D, FUN3D, and NSU3D Contributions to the Fifth Drag Prediction Workshop , 2013 .

[17]  H. M. Joseph,et al.  Numerical Study of Turbulence Model Predictions for the MD 30P/30N and NHLP-2D Three-Element Highlift Configurations , 1998 .

[18]  Boris Diskin,et al.  A Critical Study of Agglomerated Multigrid Methods for Diffusion , 2009 .

[19]  Boris Diskin,et al.  A Critical Study of Agglomerated Multigrid Methods for Diffusion , 2009 .

[20]  C. L. Rumsey,et al.  Summary of the First AIAA CFD High Lift Prediction Workshop (invited) , 2011 .

[21]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  An implicit upwind algorithm for computing turbulent flows on unstructured grids , 1994 .

[22]  Christopher J. Roy,et al.  SENSEI Computational Fluid Dynamics Code: A Case Study in Modern Fortran Software Development , 2013 .

[23]  Boris Diskin,et al.  Development and Application of Agglomerated Multigrid Methods for Complex Geometries , 2010 .