Optimal Initialization for 3D Correspondence Optimization: An Evaluation Study

The identification of corresponding landmarks across a set of training shapes is a prerequisite for statistical shape model (SSM) construction. We automatically establish 3D correspondence using one new and several known alternative approaches for consistent, shape-preserving, spherical parameterization. The initial correspondence determined by all employed methods is refined by optimizing a groupwise objective function. The quality of all models before and after optimization is thoroughly evaluated using several data sets of clinically relevant, anatomical objects of varying complexity. Correspondence quality is benchmarked in terms of the SSMs' specificity and generalization ability, which are measured using different surface based distance functions. We find that our new approach performs best for complex objects. Furthermore, all new and previously published methods of our own allow for (i) building SSMs that are significantly better than the well-known SPHARM method, (ii) establishing quasi-optimal correspondence for low and moderately complex objects without additional optimization, and (iii) considerably speeding up convergence, thus, providing means for practical, fast, and accurate SSM construction.

[1]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  3D Statistical Shape Models to Embed Spatial Relationship Information , 2005, CVBIA.

[2]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  A 3D statistical shape model of the pelvic bone for segmentation , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[3]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[6]  Yanxi Liu,et al.  Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications, First International Workshop, CVBIA 2005, Beijing, China, October 21, 2005, Proceedings , 2005, CVBIA.

[7]  Sebastian T. Gollmer,et al.  A method for quantitative evaluation of statistical shape models using morphometry , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[8]  T Heimann,et al.  Automatic Generation of 3D Statistical Shape Models with Optimal Landmark Distributions , 2007, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[9]  Stefan Wesarg,et al.  Construction of groupwise consistent shape parameterizations by propagation , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[10]  Martin Styner,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Parametrization of Closed Surfaces for 3-D Shape Description , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[12]  Christopher J. Taylor,et al.  Consistent spherical parameterisation for statistical shape modelling , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[13]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Building 3-D Statistical Shape Models by Direct Optimization , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Elastic model-based segmentation of 3-D neuroradiological data sets , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Shape Discrimination in the Hippocampus Using an MDL Model , 2003, IPMI.

[16]  Martin Styner,et al.  Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Methods for Model Building , 2003, IPMI.

[17]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Berthold K. P. Horn,et al.  Closed-form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions , 1987 .