SIGMOD 2020 Tutorial on Fairness and Bias in Peer Review and Other Sociotechnical Intelligent Systems
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Martin J. Wainwright,et al. Low Permutation-Rank Matrices: Structural Properties and Noisy Completion , 2017, 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT).
[2] Ilya Shpitser,et al. Fair Inference on Outcomes , 2017, AAAI.
[3] Jie Tang,et al. Expertise Matching via Constraint-Based Optimization , 2010, Web Intelligence.
[4] Robert P Freckleton,et al. Does double-blind review benefit female authors? , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[5] M. Kocher,et al. Single-blind vs Double-blind Peer Review in the Setting of Author Prestige. , 2016, JAMA.
[6] Isabelle Guyon,et al. Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[7] E. Phelps. The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism , 1972 .
[8] Martin J. Wainwright,et al. Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issues , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.
[9] Toniann Pitassi,et al. Fairness through awareness , 2011, ITCS '12.
[10] Richard S. Zemel,et al. The Toronto Paper Matching System: An automated paper-reviewer assignment system , 2013 .
[11] Omer Lev,et al. Impartial Peer Review , 2015, IJCAI.
[12] Cheng Long,et al. On Good and Fair Paper-Reviewer Assignment , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining.
[13] Nihar B. Shah,et al. PeerReview4All: Fair and Accurate Reviewer Assignment in Peer Review , 2018, ALT.
[14] Yiling Chen,et al. A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market , 2017, WWW.
[15] A. James. 2010 , 2011, Philo of Alexandria: an Annotated Bibliography 2007-2016.
[16] Omer Lev,et al. Strategyproof Peer Selection: Mechanisms, Analyses, and Experiments , 2016, AAAI.
[17] C. Martin. 2015 , 2015, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.
[18] Noga Alon,et al. Sum of us: strategyproof selection from the selectors , 2009, TARK XIII.
[19] Hisashi Kashima,et al. Statistical quality estimation for general crowdsourcing tasks , 2013, HCOMP.
[20] Peter A. Flach,et al. Novel tools to streamline the conference review process: experiences from SIGKDD'09 , 2010, SKDD.
[21] Alexandra Chouldechova,et al. Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments , 2016, Big Data.
[22] Martin J. Wainwright,et al. A Permutation-Based Model for Crowd Labeling: Optimal Estimation and Robustness , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.
[23] S. Kerr,et al. Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals , 1977 .
[24] Nihar B. Shah,et al. On Testing for Biases in Peer Review , 2019, NeurIPS.
[25] Alexandra Chouldechova,et al. Does mitigating ML's impact disparity require treatment disparity? , 2017, NeurIPS.
[26] Pramodita Sharma. 2012 , 2013, Les 25 ans de l’OMC: Une rétrospective en photos.
[27] Sudhir R. Paul. Bayesian methods for calibration of examiners , 1981 .
[28] Jon M. Kleinberg,et al. Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Bias , 2018, ITCS.
[29] Toniann Pitassi,et al. Learning Fair Representations , 2013, ICML.
[30] Matt J. Kusner,et al. Counterfactual Fairness , 2017, NIPS.
[31] Jörg Rothe,et al. How to Calibrate the Scores of Biased Reviewers by Quadratic Programming , 2011, AAAI.
[32] Nihar B. Shah,et al. A SUPER* Algorithm to Optimize Paper Bidding in Peer Review , 2020, UAI.
[33] Min Zhang,et al. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[34] H. Moulin,et al. Impartial Nominations for a Prize , 2013 .
[35] Dirk Helbing,et al. Peer review and competition in the Art Exhibition Game , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[36] Nathan Srebro,et al. Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning , 2016, NIPS.
[37] Bernhard Schölkopf,et al. Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning , 2017, NIPS.
[38] R S MacKay,et al. Calibration with confidence: a principled method for panel assessment , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.
[39] Kurt Mehlhorn,et al. Assigning Papers to Referees , 2009, Algorithmica.
[40] Andrew McCallum,et al. Paper Matching with Local Fairness Constraints , 2019, KDD.
[41] T. Tregenza,et al. Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[42] D. Aigner,et al. Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets , 1977 .
[43] K. Arrow. The Theory of Discrimination , 1971 .
[44] Nihar B. Shah,et al. Your 2 is My 1, Your 3 is My 9: Handling Arbitrary Miscalibrations in Ratings , 2018, AAMAS.
[45] Craig Boutilier,et al. A Framework for Optimizing Paper Matching , 2011, UAI.
[46] Nihar B. Shah,et al. Choosing How to Choose Papers , 2018, ArXiv.
[47] Foster J. Provost,et al. The myth of the double-blind review?: author identification using only citations , 2003, SKDD.
[48] Felix A. Fischer,et al. Optimal impartial selection , 2013, SIAM J. Comput..
[49] Florence March,et al. 2016 , 2016, Affair of the Heart.
[50] Judy Goldsmith,et al. The AI conference paper assignment problem , 2007, AAAI 2007.
[51] Geoffroy de Clippel,et al. Impartial division of a dollar , 2008, J. Econ. Theory.
[52] Yishay Mansour,et al. Efficient candidate screening under multiple tests and implications for fairness , 2019, FORC.
[53] Carole J. Lee. Commensuration Bias in Peer Review , 2015, Philosophy of Science.
[54] Ariel D. Procaccia,et al. Ranking Wily People Who Rank Each Other , 2018, AAAI.