Single MHC mutation eliminates enthalpy associated with T cell receptor binding.

The keystone of the adaptive immune response is T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules. The crystal structure of AHIII TCR bound to MHC, HLA-A2, showed a large interface with an atypical binding orientation. MHC mutations in the interface of the proteins were tested for changes in TCR recognition. From the range of responses observed, three representative HLA-A2 mutants, T163A, W167A, and K66A, were selected for further study. Binding constants and co-crystal structures of the AHIII TCR and the three mutants were determined. K66 in HLA-A2 makes contacts with both peptide and TCR, and has been identified as a critical residue for recognition by numerous TCR. The K66A mutation resulted in the lowest AHIII T cell response and the lowest binding affinity, which suggests that the T cell response may correlate with affinity. Importantly, the K66A mutation does not affect the conformation of the peptide. The change in affinity appears to be due to a loss in hydrogen bonds in the interface as a result of a conformational change in the TCR complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) loop. Isothermal titration calorimetry confirmed the loss of hydrogen bonding by a large loss in enthalpy. Our findings are inconsistent with the notion that the CDR1 and CDR2 loops of the TCR are responsible for MHC restriction, while the CDR3 loops interact solely with the peptide. Instead, we present here an MHC mutation that does not change the conformation of the peptide, yet results in an altered conformation of a CDR3.

[1]  A M Lesk,et al.  Structural repertoire of the human VH segments. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Partho Ghosh,et al.  Structure of the complex between human T-cell receptor, viral peptide and HLA-A2 , 1996, Nature.

[3]  G. Murshudov,et al.  Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. , 1997, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[4]  Andrew Sewell,et al.  Structural and kinetic basis for heightened immunogenicity of T cell vaccines , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[5]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[6]  D. Schatz,et al.  Biochemistry of V(D)J recombination. , 2005, Current topics in microbiology and immunology.

[7]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  Crystal structure of a T cell receptor bound to an allogeneic MHC molecule , 2000, Nature Immunology.

[8]  Ettore Appella,et al.  A correlation between TCR Valpha docking on MHC and CD8 dependence: implications for T cell selection. , 2003, Immunity.

[9]  B. Baker,et al.  MHC Allele-Specific Molecular Features Determine Peptide/HLA-A2 Conformations That Are Recognized by HLA-A2-Restricted T Cell Receptors1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[10]  S. Spicuglia,et al.  Regulation of V(D)J recombination. , 2006, Current opinion in immunology.

[11]  Raimund J. Ober,et al.  Kinetics and thermodynamics of T cell receptor– autoantigen interactions in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Edward J. Collins,et al.  High Affinity Xenoreactive TCR:MHC Interaction Recruits CD8 in Absence of Binding to MHC1 , 2003, The Journal of Immunology.

[13]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  R. Hartzman,et al.  Frequencies of HLA-A2 alleles in five U.S. population groups. Predominance Of A*02011 and identification of HLA-A*0231. , 2000, Human immunology.

[15]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  B K Jakobsen,et al.  TCR binding to peptide-MHC stabilizes a flexible recognition interface. , 1999, Immunity.

[17]  C. Barnstable,et al.  Monoclonal Antibodies for Analysis of the HLA System , 1979, Immunological reviews.

[18]  D. Covell,et al.  Differential contact of disparate class I/peptide complexes as the basis for epitope cross-recognition by a single T cell receptor. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[19]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Antibody Multispecificity Mediated by Conformational Diversity , 2003, Science.

[20]  J. McCluskey,et al.  Specificity on a knife-edge: the αβ T cell receptor , 2006 .

[21]  D. Wiley,et al.  Two human T cell receptors bind in a similar diagonal mode to the HLA-A2/Tax peptide complex using different TCR amino acids. , 1998, Immunity.

[22]  Brian M. Baker,et al.  Identification of a Crucial Energetic Footprint on the α1 Helix of Human Histocompatibility Leukocyte Antigen (Hla)-A2 That Provides Functional Interactions for Recognition by Tax Peptide/Hla-A2–Specific T Cell Receptors , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[24]  A. Lesk,et al.  Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions , 1989, Nature.

[25]  James Robinson,et al.  IMGT/HLA and IMGT/MHC: sequence databases for the study of the major histocompatibility complex , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  D. Wiley,et al.  HLA-A2-peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Two-step binding mechanism for T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC , 2002, Nature.

[28]  A. Lesk,et al.  Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  J. Beck,et al.  Strategic Mutations in the Class I Major Histocompatibility Complex HLA-A2 Independently Affect Both Peptide Binding and T Cell Receptor Recognition* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Brian M Baker,et al.  Two different T cell receptors use different thermodynamic strategies to recognize the same peptide/MHC ligand. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  James McCluskey,et al.  Disparate thermodynamics governing T cell receptor-MHC-I interactions implicate extrinsic factors in guiding MHC restriction. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  P. Anton van der Merwe,et al.  CDR3 loop flexibility contributes to the degeneracy of TCR recognition , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[33]  G N Murshudov,et al.  Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. , 2001, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[34]  V. Engelhard,et al.  Isolation and characterization of monoclonal mouse cytotoxic T lymphocytes with specificity for HLA-A,B or -DR alloantigens. , 1982, Journal of immunology.

[35]  Daniel C. Douek,et al.  T Cell Cross-Reactivity and Conformational Changes during TCR Engagement , 2004, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[36]  Nicholas A Williamson,et al.  A T cell receptor flattens a bulged antigenic peptide presented by a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[37]  K. Garcia,et al.  How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC , 2007, Cell.

[38]  L R Pease,et al.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen. , 1998, Science.

[39]  Collaborative Computational,et al.  The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[40]  Bernard Malissen,et al.  A T cell receptor CDR3beta loop undergoes conformational changes of unprecedented magnitude upon binding to a peptide/MHC class I complex. , 2002, Immunity.

[41]  Ian W. Davis,et al.  Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation , 2003, Proteins.

[42]  Natalie A Borg,et al.  T cell receptor recognition of a 'super-bulged' major histocompatibility complex class I–bound peptide , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[43]  K. P. Murphy,et al.  Evaluation of linked protonation effects in protein binding reactions using isothermal titration calorimetry. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[44]  K. Garcia,et al.  A functional hot spot for antigen recognition in a superagonist TCR/MHC complex. , 2000, Immunity.

[45]  R. Read,et al.  Improved Structure Refinement Through Maximum Likelihood , 1996 .

[46]  A Tramontano,et al.  Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[47]  R. Henderson,et al.  Direct identification of an endogenous peptide recognized by multiple HLA-A2.1-specific cytotoxic T cells. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  Brian M Baker,et al.  Unraveling a hotspot for TCR recognition on HLA-A2: evidence against the existence of peptide-independent TCR binding determinants. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  J. Whisstock,et al.  A Structural Basis for the Selection of Dominant αβ T Cell Receptors in Antiviral Immunity , 2003 .

[50]  B M Baker,et al.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. , 1999, Immunity.

[51]  D. Myszka,et al.  CLAMP: a biosensor kinetic data analysis program. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[52]  L. K. Ely,et al.  The CDR3 regions of an immunodominant T cell receptor dictate the 'energetic landscape' of peptide-MHC recognition , 2005, Nature Immunology.

[53]  D. Madden The three-dimensional structure of peptide-MHC complexes. , 1995, Annual review of immunology.

[54]  Robyn L Stanfield,et al.  How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[55]  Brian M Baker,et al.  T cell receptor binding transition states and recognition of peptide/MHC. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[56]  J. Punt,et al.  Brief Definitive Report Identification of CD8 as a Peanut Agglutinin (PNA) Receptor Molecule on Immature Thymocytes , 2022 .