Public Infrastructure Service Flexibility for Response and Recovery in the September 11th, 2001 Attacks at the World Trade Center (Online)

After the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, the ability to rapidly restore transportation, power, water, and environmental services to users was absolutely critical, especially to those involved in the immediate search, rescue, and recovery operations. What better way could infrastructure serve its users—both emergency workers and the general public—than to be able to respond quickly in a crisis? The ability to provide these services required a degree of flexibility, often unanticipated and unplanned, that only became apparent as the response efforts unfolded. The capability of basic infrastructure service providers to respond to public needs for transportation, energy, communication, water, sanitation, and solid waste removal after the September 11th attacks was to a great extent influenced by the flexibility of the initial infrastructure design and management functions to respond to normal system disruptions and to extreme, but not necessarily terrorist-related, events.

[1]  A. Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[2]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Reducing vulnerability of water supply systems to attack , 1998 .

[3]  M. Morris Understanding Risk - Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1997 .

[4]  L B Lave,et al.  Risk Analysis and Management of Dam Safety , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Craig Partridge,et al.  The Internet Under Crisis Conditions: Learning from September 11 , 2003 .

[6]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[7]  Rae Zimmerman,et al.  Social Implications of Infrastructure Network Interactions , 2001 .

[8]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[9]  B. Alberts Human Factors Issues in the National Academies Report Making the Nation Safer : The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism , 2002 .

[10]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Adapting the environmental impact statement process to inform decision makers , 1992 .

[11]  K Flynn,et al.  Fatal confusion: 9/11 exposed deadly flaws in rescue plan , 2003 .

[12]  Shin Ta Liu,et al.  Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management , 1999, Technometrics.

[13]  Christine L Borgman,et al.  Final Report to the National Science Foundation , 2002 .

[14]  William Langewiesche,et al.  American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center , 2002 .

[15]  R. McClellan A commentary on the NRC report "Science and judgment in risk assessment". , 1994, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.