The improved heat integration of cement production under limited process conditions: A case study for Croatia

Abstract Given that cement is the most widely used material for housing and modern infrastructure needs, this paper analyses the energy efficiency of the cement manufacturing processes for a particular cement plant. The cement industry is one of the largest consumers of carbon-containing primary energy sources and one of the primary polluters of the environment, emitting approximately 5% of global pollution. Energy consumption represents the largest part of the production cost for cement factories and has a significant influence on product prices. Given that it is realised in modern society that infrastructural projects lead to a higher level of economy and sustainability for countries, reducing the production cost in the cement industry is a very important problem. The authors analysed the energy consumption of a particular cement factory in Croatia to determine the minimum energy targets of production and proposed pathways to improve energy efficiency. The Process Integration approach was used in this study. Nevertheless, the features of the cement factory forced the research to update its methodological steps to propose real pathways for a retrofit project with the aim of achieving the optimal minimum temperature difference between process streams. There are various streams, including those that contain solid particles, gas and air streams, and streams, that should be cooled down rapidly; these facts become more complicated by the special construction of the process equipment, which causes heat transfer between some streams to be impossible. The main objective of this paper is to determine the potential of real energy savings and propose a solution for a new concept of heat exchanger network (HEN) that avoids the process traps and provides a feasible retrofit. The maximum heat recovery of that production of a particular type of cement was determined and improved when a HEN was built. The authors conclude that the energy consumption of the cement factory can be reduced by 30%, with an estimated recovery period of 3.4 months. The implementation of this retrofit project helps the plant’s profitability and improves the environmental impact of the cement manufacturing process.

[1]  Carl-Erik Grip,et al.  Process integration. Tests and application of different tools on an integrated steelmaking site , 2013 .

[2]  Gordana Stefanović,et al.  CO2 reduction options in cement industry: The Novi Popovac case , 2010 .

[3]  Neven Duić,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Different Cement Manufacturing Processes Based on Emergy and Ecological Footprint Analysis , 2016 .

[4]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Technological and Economical Survey of Organic Rankine Cycle Systems , 2009 .

[5]  He Weifeng,et al.  Experimental study on Organic Rankine cycle for low grade thermal energy recovery. , 2016 .

[6]  Sharifah Rafidah Wan Alwi,et al.  Process Integration and Intensification: Saving Energy, Water and Resources , 2014 .

[7]  Neven Duić,et al.  Improving the sustainability of cement production by using numerical simulation of limestone thermal degradation and pulverized coal combustion in a cement calciner , 2015 .

[8]  Luis Puigjaner,et al.  Targeting and design methodology for reduction of fuel, power and CO2 on total sites , 1997 .

[9]  Robin Smith,et al.  Heat recovery and power targeting in utility systems , 2015 .

[10]  Arnaud Mercier,et al.  Prospective on the energy efficiency and CO 2 emissions in the EU cement industry , 2011 .

[11]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Process modifications to maximise energy savings in total site heat integration , 2015 .

[12]  Claudia Sheinbaum,et al.  Energy use and CO2 emissions for Mexico's cement industry , 1998 .

[13]  S. Tsimas,et al.  Reuse of By-Products from Ready-Mixed Concrete Plants for the Production of Cement Mortars , 2013 .

[14]  Stanislav Boldyryev,et al.  Capital Cost Targeting of Total Site Heat Recovery , 2012 .

[15]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Potentials for energy efficiency improvement in the US cement industry , 2000 .

[16]  Megan Jobson,et al.  Evaluating the potential of process sites for waste heat recovery , 2016 .

[17]  Yiping Dai,et al.  Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry , 2009 .

[18]  Neven Duić,et al.  Reducing the CO2 emissions in Croatian cement industry , 2013 .

[19]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Applied thermal engineering solutions through process integration, modelling and optimisation , 2015 .

[20]  Adem Atmaca,et al.  Analysis of the parameters affecting energy consumption of a rotary kiln in cement industry , 2014 .

[21]  Lei Shi,et al.  Integrating environmental impact minimization into conceptual chemical process design — a process systems engineering review , 2000 .

[22]  Andrea Lazzaretto,et al.  Energy Integration in the cement industry , 2013 .

[23]  Hanmin Chen.  Technical benefit and risk analysis on cement clinkering process with compact internal burning of carbon , 2015 .

[24]  Marc Ross,et al.  Energy efficiency of China's cement industry , 1995 .

[25]  Neven Duić,et al.  Numerical study of co-firing pulverized coal and biomass inside a cement calciner , 2014, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[26]  Lynn Price,et al.  The CO2 abatement cost curve for the Thailand cement industry , 2010 .

[27]  Majid Amidpour,et al.  Application of R-curve analysis in evaluating the effect of integrating renewable energies in cogeneration systems , 2016 .

[28]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Minimum heat transfer area for Total Site heat recovery , 2014 .

[29]  Stanislav Boldyryev,et al.  Low potential heat utilization of bromine plant via integration on process and Total Site levels , 2015 .