Single molecule detection in nanofluidic digital array enables accurate measurement of DNA copy number

AbstractDigital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a promising technique for estimating target DNA copy number. PCR solution is distributed throughout numerous partitions, and following amplification, target DNA copy number is estimated based on the proportion of partitions containing amplified DNA. Here, we identify approaches for obtaining reliable digital PCR data. Single molecule amplification efficiency was significantly improved following fragmentation of total DNA and bias in copy number estimates reduced by analysis of short intact target DNA fragments. Random and independent distribution of target DNA molecules throughout partitions, which is critical to accurate digital PCR measurement, was demonstrated by spatial distribution analysis. The estimated relative uncertainty for target DNA concentration was under 6% when analyzing five digital panels comprising 765 partitions each, provided the panels contained an average of 212 to 3,365 template molecules. Partition volume was a major component of this uncertainty estimate. These findings can be applied to other digital PCR studies to improve confidence in such measurements. FigureDigital PCR amplification plot (left) and panel read out (right) of HindIII-digested pIRMM69. pIRMM69 contains one HindIII restriction enzyme site outside the hmg and transgene fragments used as targets in PCR. Red boxes with white shade denote positive hits containing one or more target DNA molecules, and white boxes with grey shade refer to no target being amplified.

[1]  A. Orpana,et al.  Accuracy in amplification , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Tak Y. Leung,et al.  Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  R. Chiu,et al.  Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal aneuploidies by maternal plasma nucleic acid analysis. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  Tze Kin Lau,et al.  Microfluidics digital PCR reveals a higher than expected fraction of fetal DNA in maternal plasma. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  Adrian Baddeley,et al.  spatstat: An R Package for Analyzing Spatial Point Patterns , 2005 .

[6]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Mathematical Analysis of Copy Number Variation in a DNA Sample Using Digital PCR on a Nanofluidic Device , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  Nathan Blow,et al.  PCR's next frontier , 2007, Nature Methods.

[8]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Digital PCR. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  High Throughput Gene Expression Measurement with Real Time PCR in a Microfluidic Dynamic Array , 2008, PloS one.

[10]  Mats Nilsson,et al.  Digital quantification using amplified single-molecule detection , 2006, Nature Methods.

[11]  J. Radich,et al.  Absolute quantitative detection of ABL tyrosine kinase domain point mutations in chronic myeloid leukemia using a novel nanofluidic platform and mutation-specific PCR , 2009, Leukemia.

[12]  Ie-Ming Shih,et al.  Principle and applications of digital PCR , 2004, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[13]  Ramesh Ramakrishnan,et al.  Studying copy number variations using a nanofluidic platform , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  Kyoko Iwao-Koizumi,et al.  A novel technique for measuring variations in DNA copy-number: competitive genomic polymerase chain reaction , 2007, BMC Genomics.

[15]  David Bryder,et al.  Transcription factor profiling in individual hematopoietic progenitors by digital RT-PCR , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  C. Georgiou,et al.  Assay for the quantification of intact/fragmented genomic DNA. , 2006, Analytical biochemistry.