PURPOSE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ), a novel diterpene plant product in the treatment of previously untreated patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with extensive-disease SCLC received paclitaxel 250 mg/m2 intravenously over 24 hours every 3 weeks. Nonresponders or partial responders, who received the maximum number of cycles (n = 4) of paclitaxel received salvage chemotherapy that consisted of etoposide (VP-16) 120 mg/m2 intravenously over 45 minutes on days 1, 2, and 3, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously as a short infusion on day 1. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks.
RESULTS
Of 36 patients entered onto the study, 34 and 32 patients were assessable for toxicity and response, respectively. No complete responses (CRs) were observed. Eleven patients (34%) had a partial response (PR) and six (19%) had stable disease (SD). In three of six patients categorized as having SD, there was greater than 50% tumor shrinkage. However, no 4-week follow-up measurements were made, so these could not be considered PRs, in part because patients received salvage chemotherapy by study design. In this trial, induction and salvage chemotherapy resulted in a response (two CRs and 15 PRs) (53%) in 17 patients. The estimated median survival duration was 43 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was leukopenia, with 19 patients (56%) having grade 4 leukopenia. The numbers of patients who experienced other grade 4 toxicities were as follows: pulmonary, three (9%); liver, two (6%); cardiac, one (3%); thrombocytopenia, one (3%); metabolic, one (3%); stomatitis, one (3%); and allergic reaction, one (3%). Four additional patients had grade 3 leukopenia and one patient (3%) died of sepsis (grade 5 toxicity).
CONCLUSION
Paclitaxel is an active new agent in the treatment of SCLC. Further investigation of this agent in combination with other active agents is appropriate.
[1]
D. Ettinger,et al.
Justification for evaluating new anticancer drugs in selected untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized study.
,
1992,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[2]
E. Hall,et al.
Taxol: a novel radiation sensitizer.
,
1992,
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.
[3]
L. Grochow,et al.
Phase I trial of taxol in patients with advanced cancer.
,
1987,
Cancer treatment reports.
[4]
R. Lipton,et al.
Phase I trial of taxol given as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days: responses observed in metastatic melanoma.
,
1987,
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[5]
R. Lipton,et al.
Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of taxol.
,
1987,
Cancer research.
[6]
E. McFadden,et al.
Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
,
1982,
American journal of clinical oncology.
[7]
J Parness,et al.
Taxol binds to polymerized tubulin in vitro
,
1981,
The Journal of cell biology.
[8]
P. Schiff,et al.
Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol
,
1979,
Nature.
[9]
A. McPhail,et al.
Plant antitumor agents. VI. The isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent from Taxus brevifolia.
,
1971,
Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[10]
E. Kaplan,et al.
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
,
1958
.
[11]
W. S. Lazarus-Barlow,et al.
THE NATURAL DURATION OF CANCER
,
1924,
British medical journal.