Why share expertise? A closer look at the quality of motivation to share or withhold knowledge

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of motivation for knowledge sharing (KS) by assessing how four qualitatively different motivation types, as per self-determination theory (SDT), predict KS, its quality and its undesirable counterpart, knowledge withholding. Design/methodology/approach The study was carried out as a survey (n = 200) in an expert organization. The analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling. Findings Autonomous type of extrinsic motivation (identified motivation) was the strongest predictor of KS (in work meetings) and its quality, whereas the other motivation types (intrinsic, introjected and external) had no independent contribution to variance in KS. Knowledge withholding was negatively associated with identified and positively with external KS motivation. Research limitations/implications Single organization limits the generalizability of the results. Future studies should further investigate the role of identified motivation for various KS behaviors. Practical implications The findings suggest that autonomy-supportive management practices known to facilitate self-determined behavior can improve KS. Fostering external motivation by incentivizing KS may be both ineffective and have undesirable consequences. Originality/value Few prior studies investigate KS motivation beyond external and intrinsic motivation or apply SDT to KS using SDT-based scales. This study distinguishes between four different motivation types and is the first to investigate their differential impact on KS and its quality. It is also the first to demonstrate the importance of identified motivation for KS. It further elucidates how the quality of KS motivation is reflected in knowledge withholding, an overall underinvestigated behavior.

[1]  Joon Koh,et al.  An Integrative Model for Knowledge Sharing in Communities-of-Practice , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Dan N. Stone,et al.  Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: a meta-analysis and critique , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[4]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations , 2011 .

[5]  Jialin Yi.  A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: scale development and validation , 2009 .

[6]  Annette Mills,et al.  An Investigation of the Impact of Intrinsic Motivation on Organizational Knowledge Sharing , 2012, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Niklas Ravaja,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in the work context by applying a belief elicitation study , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  R. Noe,et al.  Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research , 2010 .

[9]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[10]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Social capital and individual motivations on knowledge sharing: Participant involvement as a moderator , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Xuequn Wang,et al.  Encouraging knowledge contribution in IT support: social context and the differential effects of motivation type , 2015, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[13]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  What is Knowledge Sharing from the Informer's Perspective? , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[14]  Cody R. DeHaan,et al.  On the Mutuality of Human Motivation and Relationships , 2014 .

[15]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[16]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[17]  E. Deci,et al.  Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic-dialectical perspective. , 2002 .

[18]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Incentives That Induce Task-Related Effort, Helping, and Knowledge Sharing in Workgroups , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[20]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[21]  J. H. Steiger.  Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. , 1980 .

[22]  Willy Lens,et al.  Motivational Profiles from a Self-Determination Perspective: The Quality of Motivation Matters. , 2009 .

[23]  R. Koestner,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Identified Regulation in Distinct Political Campaigns: The Consequences of Following Politics for Pleasure Versus Personal Meaningfulness , 1999 .

[24]  R. Koestner,et al.  Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. , 2002 .

[25]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices , 2005 .

[26]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: How job design matters , 2009 .

[27]  Andreas Riege,et al.  Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Juliane Jung,et al.  Understanding Motivation And Emotion , 2016 .

[29]  M. K. Raja,et al.  A unified model of knowledge sharing behaviours: theoretical development and empirical test , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[30]  Weidong Zhu,et al.  An integrated theoretical model for determinants of knowledge sharing behaviours , 2012, Kybernetes.

[31]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[32]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[33]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[34]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  To give or to receive? Factors influencing members' knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[35]  Wei-Tsong Wang,et al.  Motivations of employees' knowledge sharing behaviors: A self-determination perspective , 2015, Inf. Organ..

[36]  R. Koestner,et al.  The differential effects of intrinsic and identified motivation on well-being and performance: prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to self-determination theory. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[38]  M. Ipe.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Conceptual Framework , 2003 .

[39]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing , 2006 .

[40]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  A KNOWLEDGE-BASED THEORY OF THE FIRM TO GUIDE IN STRATEGY FORMULATION , 2001 .

[41]  Patricia Milne,et al.  Motivation, incentives and organisational culture , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[42]  E. Deci,et al.  Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. , 1994, Journal of personality.

[43]  Dan N. Stone,et al.  Industry culture influences pseudo-knowledge sharing: a multiple mediation analysis , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[44]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[45]  Marylène Gagné.  A model of knowledge‐sharing motivation , 2009 .

[46]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[47]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Facilitating Acceptance of Organizational Change: The Importance of Self-Determination' , 2000 .

[48]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  DIFFERENT KNOWLEDGE, DIFFERENT BENEFITS: TOWARD APRODUCTIVITY PERSPECTIVE ON KNOWLEDGE SHARING INORGANIZATIONS. , 2001 .

[50]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Knowledge management: theory and practice , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[51]  Pierre-Yves Oudeyer,et al.  What is Intrinsic Motivation? A Typology of Computational Approaches , 2007, Frontiers Neurorobotics.

[52]  Chih-Chien Wang,et al.  The Influence of Ethical and Self-Interest Concerns on Knowledge Sharing Intentions among Managers: An Empirical Study , 2004 .

[53]  Emanuela Chemolli,et al.  Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. , 2014, Psychological assessment.

[54]  He Peng,et al.  Counterproductive Work Behavior Among Chinese Knowledge Workers , 2012 .

[55]  T. Pedersen,et al.  Why a Central Network Position Isn't Enough: The Role of Motivation and Ability for Knowledge Sharing in Employee Networks , 2011 .

[56]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[57]  Kennon M. Sheldon,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES Motivating Learning, Performance, and Persistence: The Synergistic Effects of Intrinsic Goal Contents and Autonomy-Supportive Contexts , 2004 .

[58]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries , 2015 .