Relating solution physicochemical properties to internal concentration polarization in forward osmos

Recently forward osmosis (FO) has attracted growing attention on many potential applications such as wastewater treatment, desalination and power generation. FO performance is primarily limited by the presence of internal concentration polarization (ICP), which significantly reduces the permeate flux. This study explores the relationship between the physicochemical properties of the solution against the membrane support layer and ICP by incorporating constrictivity. Four solutions with different diffusivities, ion/molecule sizes and viscosities were systematically investigated using a bench-scale FO system. It is found that ICP in the support layer is strongly dependent on the physicochemical properties of the solution facing the support layer. When the solution against the membrane support layer has a lower aqueous diffusivity but larger ion/molecule size and higher viscosity, The ICP phenomenon will be more severe, resulting in lower water flux. The identical diffusion direction of the feed solute and the water flux may reduce the effective diffusivity of the solute in the support layer when the feed solution facing the membrane support layer, resulting in high concentrative ICP. These findings have significant implications for the development of new draw solutes, the pretreatment of the feed solution and the selection of the membrane orientation.

[1]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Qian Yang,et al.  Cellulose acetate nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis processes , 2010 .

[3]  P. Azoubel,et al.  Evaluation of water and sucrose diffusion coefficients during osmotic dehydration of jenipapo (Genipa americana L.) , 2007 .

[4]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Study of draw solutes using 2-methylimidazole-based compounds in forward osmosis , 2010 .

[5]  J. Schultz,et al.  Hindered Diffusion in Microporous Membranes with Known Pore Geometry , 1970, Science.

[6]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[7]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[8]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane , 2010 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  H. Lazarides,et al.  Osmotic concentration of liquid foods , 2001 .

[11]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[12]  Peter Grathwohl,et al.  Diffusion in Natural Porous Media: Contaminant Transport, Sorption/Desorption and Dissolution Kinetics , 1998 .

[13]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[14]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  High recovery of concentrated RO brines using forward osmosis and membrane distillation , 2009 .

[15]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[16]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Hydrophilic Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, and Performance in Forward Osmosis Processes , 2011 .

[17]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Relating performance of thin-film composite forward osmosis membranes to support layer formation and , 2011 .

[18]  M. Bradbury,et al.  The effect of dead-end porosity on rock-matrix diffusion , 1985 .

[19]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[20]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[21]  V. Lobo,et al.  Mutual diffusion coefficients in aqueous electrolyte solutions (Technical Report) , 1993 .

[22]  Markku J. Lampinen,et al.  Thermodynamic optimizing of pressure-retarded osmosis power generation systems , 1999 .

[23]  S. Loeb,et al.  Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane , 1997 .

[24]  Qian Yang,et al.  A novel dual-layer forward osmosis membrane for protein enrichment and concentration , 2009 .

[25]  Dan Li,et al.  Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[26]  R. C. Weast.  Handbook of chemistry and physics , 1973 .

[27]  Gary L. Amy,et al.  Well-constructed cellulose acetate membranes for forward osmosis: Minimized internal concentration polarization with an ultra-thin selective layer , 2010 .

[28]  R. Baker.  Membrane Technology and Applications , 1999 .

[29]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Performance evaluation of sucrose concentration using forward osmosis , 2009 .

[30]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes: Fouling reversibility and cleaning without chemical reagents , 2010 .

[31]  Kil Jin Park,et al.  Osmotic dehydration kinetics of pear D'anjou (Pyrus communis L.) , 2002 .

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[33]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Highly Water-Soluble Magnetic Nanoparticles as Novel Draw Solutes in Forward Osmosis for Water Reuse , 2010 .

[34]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Modeling water flux in forward osmosis: Implications for improved membrane design , 2007 .

[35]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications , 2010 .

[36]  K. Petrotos,et al.  A study of the direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane – module configuration. I. The effect of certain basic process parameters on the process performance , 1998 .

[37]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[38]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Double-Skinned Forward Osmosis Membranes for Reducing Internal Concentration Polarization within the Porous Sublayer , 2010 .

[39]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .

[40]  K. Petrotos,et al.  Direct osmotic concentration of tomato juice in tubular membrane – module configuration. II. The effect of using clarified tomato juice on the process performance , 1999 .

[41]  K. D. Collins,et al.  Dynamic hydration numbers for biologically important ions. , 2002, Biophysical chemistry.

[42]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration , 2010 .

[43]  Kai Yu Wang,et al.  Polybenzimidazole (PBI) nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes applied in forward osmosis process , 2007 .

[44]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[45]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[46]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[47]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .