Modulation discrimination interference for narrow-band noise modulators.

The discrimination of the depth of amplitude modulation of a signal carrier frequency can be disrupted by the presence of other modulated carriers (maskers), an effect called modulation discrimination interference (MDI). This paper examines whether MDI is influenced by the similarity in the envelope pattern of the signal and masker. A narrow-band noise (centered at 10 Hz) was used as the signal modulator. The first experiment used masker modulators that were narrow-band noises identical in spectral characteristics to the signal modulator. The masker modulators were either identical to the signal modulator, negatively correlated with it, or uncorrelated with it. The amount of MDI was similar for all three cases. In experiment 2, the masker was sinusoidally modulated at rates varying from 2 to 64 Hz. The results showed a broad tuning for modulation rate, comparable to that found for sinusoidal modulation of the signal. The maximum amount of MDI produced by the sinusoidally modulated masker was similar to that produced by the noise-modulated maskers when modulation depths were expressed as their root-mean-square values. It is concluded that similarity of the moment-by-moment envelope pattern of the signal and masker modulators plays only a minor role in MDI, although similarity in modulation rate has some influence.

[1]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Across-channel Masking of Changes in Modulation Depth for Amplitude- and Frequency-modulated Signals , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen McAdams,et al.  Spectral fusion, spectral parsing and the formation of auditory images , 1984 .

[3]  S. Rice Mathematical analysis of random noise , 1944 .

[4]  J. Hall,et al.  Modulation detection interference using random and sinusoidal amplitude modulation. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  B C Moore,et al.  Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S P Bacon,et al.  Modulation detection interference under conditions favoring within- or across-channel processing. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Monotic and dichotic modulation detection interference in practiced and unpracticed subjects. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[9]  C. Darwin,et al.  Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  W A Yost,et al.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  W A Yost,et al.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Detection of changes in modulation depth of a target sound in the presence of other modulated sounds , 1992 .

[13]  J. Culling,et al.  Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[14]  T D Carrell,et al.  The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J H Grose,et al.  Some effects of auditory grouping factors on modulation detection interference (MDI). , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.