Classification of Domain Movements in Proteins Using Dynamic Contact Graphs

A new method for the classification of domain movements in proteins is described and applied to 1822 pairs of structures from the Protein Data Bank that represent a domain movement in two-domain proteins. The method is based on changes in contacts between residues from the two domains in moving from one conformation to the other. We argue that there are five types of elemental contact changes and that these relate to five model domain movements called: “free”, “open-closed”, “anchored”, “sliding-twist”, and “see-saw.” A directed graph is introduced called the “Dynamic Contact Graph” which represents the contact changes in a domain movement. In many cases a graph, or part of a graph, provides a clear visual metaphor for the movement it represents and is a motif that can be easily recognised. The Dynamic Contact Graphs are often comprised of disconnected subgraphs indicating independent regions which may play different roles in the domain movement. The Dynamic Contact Graph for each domain movement is decomposed into elemental Dynamic Contact Graphs, those that represent elemental contact changes, allowing us to count the number of instances of each type of elemental contact change in the domain movement. This naturally leads to sixteen classes into which the 1822 domain movements are classified.

[1]  Jaap Heringa,et al.  An analysis of protein domain linkers: their classification and role in protein folding. , 2002, Protein engineering.

[2]  R Nussinov,et al.  Interdomain interactions in hinge-bending transitions. , 2001, Structure.

[3]  A. Lesk,et al.  Structural mechanisms for domain movements in proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[4]  Steven Hayward,et al.  Database of ligand-induced domain movements in enzymes , 2009, BMC Structural Biology.

[5]  J. Skolnick,et al.  What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins? , 2007, Proteins.

[6]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Model‐free methods of analyzing domain motions in proteins from simulation: A comparison of normal mode analysis and molecular dynamics simulation of lysozyme , 1997, Proteins.

[7]  S. Hayward,et al.  Structural principles governing domain motions in proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[8]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A database of macromolecular motions. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  J. Thornton,et al.  Conformational changes observed in enzyme crystal structures upon substrate binding. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Motonori Ota,et al.  Protein structural change upon ligand binding correlates with enzymatic reaction mechanism. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  Georg E Schulz Domain motions in proteins , 1992, Current Biology.

[12]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  Richard A. Lee,et al.  A comprehensive and non-redundant database of protein domain movements , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  W. Bennett,et al.  Structural and functional aspects of domain motions in proteins. , 1984, CRC critical reviews in biochemistry.

[15]  Motonori Ota,et al.  PSCDB: a database for protein structural change upon ligand binding , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Steven Hayward,et al.  Improvements in the analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: DynDom version 1.50. , 2002, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[17]  M Gerstein,et al.  Domain closure in lactoferrin. Two hinges produce a see-saw motion between alternative close-packed interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change: New results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme , 1998, Proteins.

[19]  A. Kidera,et al.  Classification and annotation of the relationship between protein structural change and ligand binding. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Steven Hayward,et al.  A method for the analysis of domain movements in large biomolecular complexes , 2009, Proteins.