GERMAN WORD FORMATION AND APHASIA

The goal of this investigation is to show how neuropsychological dissociations in aphasic language disorders can be explained with reference to explicit linguistic theories and how aphasiological data can help to find an optimal linguistic theory supposing, of course, that linguistic theory considers itself part of the study of cognition. Our topic is the interplay of lexical and nonlexical knowledge/processes and the internal structure of the lexicon in grammar and in its aphasic disruption. Our interest in aphasia and in this particular topic suggests the selection of generative grammar as an appropriate frame of reference. To our knowledge, no other linguistic theory that is worked out in sufficient detail makes explicit assumptions about grammar as an object of psychology, e.g. with respect to learnability and modularity. Concerning the place of morphology, it has been rather uncontroversial since Chomsky (1970) that derivational morphology should not interfere with syntactic operations (see however Fabb 1984); on the other ha~d, it remains an issue of controversy whether inflection should be considered part of a lexical word-formation component or part of syntax proper. We will present two German-speaking aphasic patients with a rather rare and remarkable dissociation between a preserved morphophonological lexicon and a disrupted syntax with an almost total loss of semantics. Data from these patients, among other considerations, will be used to support theories of grammar that locate inflectional morphology, together with more "classical" domains of word formation, in the lexicon. The article is organized as follows. In section 1 some remarks are made concerning the relationship between linguistic theory, linguistic processing,

[1]  N. Geschwind.  Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. II. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. T. Jensen,et al.  Morphology is in the lexicon , 1984 .

[3]  Wus van Lessen Kloeke.  Deutsche Phonologie und Morphologie: Merkmale und Markiertheit , 1982 .

[4]  R. D. Bleser,et al.  From agrammatism to paragrammatism: German aphasiological traditions and grammatical disturbances , 1987 .

[5]  Emmon Bach.  Grammatik des deutschen Verbs , 1964 .

[6]  K Willmes,et al.  The Aachen Aphasia Test. , 1984, Advances in neurology.

[7]  Jindrich Toman,et al.  The Case of German , 1985 .

[8]  Jürgen Lenerz,et al.  Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen , 1977 .

[9]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Dissociations of language function in dementia: A case study , 1979, Brain and Language.

[10]  J. Toman,et al.  On Composition and Derivation: The Constituent Structure of Secondary Words in German , 1985 .

[11]  H. Whitaker.  A Case of the Isolation of the Language Function , 1976 .

[12]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[13]  M. Halle,et al.  Segmental phonology of Modern English , 1985 .

[14]  Steven G. Lapointe,et al.  Some issues in the linguistic description of agrammatism , 1983, Cognition.

[15]  S. Sasanuma,et al.  The syndrome of Gogi (word‐meaning) aphasia , 1975, Neurology.

[16]  Chapter Xvi,et al.  ISOLATION OF THE SPEECH AREA , 1974 .

[17]  D. Siegel.  Topics in English morphology , 1979 .

[18]  Paul Kiparsky,et al.  Word-formation and the lexicon , 1982 .

[19]  J. Berko.  The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[20]  A. Pick,et al.  Die agrammatischen Sprachstörungen , 1913 .

[21]  P. Kiparsky.  From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology , 1982 .

[22]  Emmon Bach,et al.  The Order of Elements in a Transformational Grammar of German , 1962 .

[23]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Remarks on Nominalization , 2020, Nominalization.

[24]  H. Bochner.  Inflection Within Derivation , 1983 .

[25]  M. Arbib,et al.  Neurolinguistics must be computational , 1979 .

[26]  John Morton,et al.  Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model , 1979 .

[27]  T. Hatta.  Neurolinguistic aspects of the japanese writing system, M. Paradis, H. Hagiwara, N. Hildebrandt. Academic Press, New York (1985), xvi + 222 , 1986 .

[28]  H. Gardner,et al.  Repetition in the transcortical aphasias , 1978, Brain and Language.