Surrogate modeling in design optimization of structures with discontinuous responses

Advances in computational technology have resulted in the dramatic reduction of computational time for crashworthiness analysis, hence enabling its structural design optimization. Surrogate modeling has been shown to further reduce computational effort as well as to smooth noisy responses. Crashworthiness optimization problems are, though, ill posed as they include nonlinear, noncontinuous and noisy responses. This violates the Hadamard conditions for well-posed problems and therefore the applicability of gradient-based algorithms is limited. Here, discontinuities in the responses with respect to the design variables will be handled that result in large changes in the system functions with only small changes in the design variables using a novel surrogate modeling technique. The applicability of typical global surrogate models is limited when critical discontinuities are present. An efficient method has been developed here to identify the number of discontinuities and their position in the design domain. Previous works assume a said number of discontinuities; here though, the number of discontinuities is not given a priori. The discontinuities are identified by examining the relative difference in the response value of samples in immediate proximity of each other. Samples in the same continuous subdomain are clustered and a support vector machine for classification is exploited to locate discontinuities. Local approximations are then used for the continuous subspaces between the discontinuities. Lastly, a surrogate-based design optimization is carried out. Starting with a two-bar truss, demonstrating a snap-through discontinuity, this method is shown to account for such discontinuities. This is then integrated into an optimization framework. Further academic example, namely a six-bar truss is modeled using the open-source framework Kratos Multiphysics and then optimized, showing the applicability of the method to problems with multiple discontinuities. Finally, a crash-absorbing tube is optimized that is impacted with an angle resulting in a noncontinuous design space: desired axial crushing and undesirable global buckling. After summarizing the results, advantages and possible limitations are discussed.

[1]  Bernard Yannou,et al.  Metamodeling of Combined Discrete/Continuous Responses , 2001 .

[2]  Alex A. Gorodetsky,et al.  Efficient Localization of Discontinuities in Complex Computational Simulations , 2014, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  Eugenio Oñate,et al.  An Object-oriented Environment for Developing Finite Element Codes for Multi-disciplinary Applications , 2010 .

[4]  Israel Zang,et al.  Discontinuous Optimization by Smoothing , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[5]  Antonio Harrison Sánchez,et al.  Limit state function identification using Support Vector Machines for discontinuous responses and disjoint failure domains , 2008 .

[6]  G. Gary Wang,et al.  Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions , 2010 .

[7]  Jianguang Fang,et al.  On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art , 2017 .

[8]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[9]  Horst Baier,et al.  Investigation, Optimal Design and Uncertainty Analysis of Crash-absorbing, Extruded Aluminum Structures☆ , 2014 .

[10]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  A convex hull approach for the reliability-based design optimization of nonlinear transient dynamic problems , 2007 .

[11]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[12]  Jian Chen,et al.  Optimal design of aeroengine turbine disc based on kriging surrogate models , 2011 .

[13]  Qing Li,et al.  Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria , 2007 .

[14]  H. Baier,et al.  Ill-posed problems in structural optimization and their practical consequences , 1994 .

[15]  Tomas Jansson,et al.  Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization – with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming , 2003 .

[16]  Qian Xu,et al.  Extended Surrogate Modeling Techniques for Large Scale Structural Design Optimization , 2014 .

[17]  Erich Wehrle,et al.  Design optimization of lightweight space-frame structures considering crashworthiness and parameter uncertainty , 2015 .

[18]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[19]  Samy Missoum,et al.  Local update of support vector machine decision boundaries , 2009 .

[20]  Xu Han,et al.  Multiobjective optimization for tapered circular tubes , 2011 .

[21]  A. Basudhar,et al.  Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines , 2008 .

[22]  Ping Zhu,et al.  A method for selecting surrogate models in crashworthiness optimization , 2012 .

[23]  M. Powell A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation , 1994 .

[24]  Fabian Duddeck,et al.  Recent Advances on Surrogate Modeling for Robustness Assessment of Structures with respect to Crashworthiness Requirements , 2015 .

[25]  Massimiliano Avalle,et al.  Design optimization by response surface methodology: application to crashworthiness design of vehicle structures , 2002 .